In his comments to our paper published on the IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics (Vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 696-702), Kleanthis Thramboulidis points out many issues related to the application of the Object-Oriented modeling approach proposed in the paper. The comments of Thramboulidis are relevant and properly referenced, especially considering the section about UML, its variants (i.e. UML 1.4, UML-RT, UML 2.0) and the conceptual elements of component based design. However, we believe that the author of the comments has focused his attention too much on the software implementation aspects, including engineering tools and run-time execution frameworks for the control software, which are actually outside the scope of the original paper. In this reply, we aim to emphasize the main contribution of the paper and analyse the issues raised in the comments, with particular regard on our plan to address them in future works.
Authors’ reply to “Comments on ‘Object-Oriented Modeling of Complex Mechatronic Components for the Manufacturing Industry’ / Secchi, Cristian; M., Bonfé; Fantuzzi, Cesare; R., Borsari; D., Borghi. - In: IEEE/ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS. - ISSN 1083-4435. - STAMPA. - 13:4(2008), pp. 487-489. [10.1109/TMECH.2008.2000639]
Authors’ reply to “Comments on ‘Object-Oriented Modeling of Complex Mechatronic Components for the Manufacturing Industry’
SECCHI, Cristian;FANTUZZI, Cesare;
2008
Abstract
In his comments to our paper published on the IEEE Transactions on Mechatronics (Vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 696-702), Kleanthis Thramboulidis points out many issues related to the application of the Object-Oriented modeling approach proposed in the paper. The comments of Thramboulidis are relevant and properly referenced, especially considering the section about UML, its variants (i.e. UML 1.4, UML-RT, UML 2.0) and the conceptual elements of component based design. However, we believe that the author of the comments has focused his attention too much on the software implementation aspects, including engineering tools and run-time execution frameworks for the control software, which are actually outside the scope of the original paper. In this reply, we aim to emphasize the main contribution of the paper and analyse the issues raised in the comments, with particular regard on our plan to address them in future works.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
04598869.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione
57.4 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
57.4 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris