Recent four valve HSDI Diesel engines are able to controlthe swirl intensity, in order to enhance the in-cylinder flowfield at partial load without decreasing breathing capabilities atfull load.Making reference to a current production engine, thepurpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of portdesign and flow-control strategies on both engine permeabilityand in-cylinder flow field.Using previously validated models, 3-D CFD simulationsof the intake and compression strokes are performed in orderto predict the in-cylinder flow patterns originated by thedifferent configurations.The comparison between the two configurations in termsof airflow at full load indicates that Geometry 2 can trap3.03% more air than Geometry 1, while the swirl intensity atIVC is reduced (-30%).The closure of one intake valve (the left one) is veryeffective to enhance the swirl intensity at partial load: theSwirl Ratio at IVC passes from 0.7 to 2.6 for Geometry 1,while for Geometry 2 it varies from 0.4 to 2.9.
Numerical Analysis of Swirl Control Strategies in a Four Valve HSDI Diesel Engine / Fontanesi, Stefano; Mattarelli, Enrico; Montorsi, Luca. - ELETTRONICO. - (2004), pp. 1-12. (Intervento presentato al convegno ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division 2004 Fall Technical Conference ICEF2004 tenutosi a Long Beach (USA) nel Ottobre 2004) [10.1115/ICEF2004-0909].
Numerical Analysis of Swirl Control Strategies in a Four Valve HSDI Diesel Engine
FONTANESI, Stefano;MATTARELLI, Enrico;MONTORSI, Luca
2004
Abstract
Recent four valve HSDI Diesel engines are able to controlthe swirl intensity, in order to enhance the in-cylinder flowfield at partial load without decreasing breathing capabilities atfull load.Making reference to a current production engine, thepurpose of this paper is to investigate the influence of portdesign and flow-control strategies on both engine permeabilityand in-cylinder flow field.Using previously validated models, 3-D CFD simulationsof the intake and compression strokes are performed in orderto predict the in-cylinder flow patterns originated by thedifferent configurations.The comparison between the two configurations in termsof airflow at full load indicates that Geometry 2 can trap3.03% more air than Geometry 1, while the swirl intensity atIVC is reduced (-30%).The closure of one intake valve (the left one) is veryeffective to enhance the swirl intensity at partial load: theSwirl Ratio at IVC passes from 0.7 to 2.6 for Geometry 1,while for Geometry 2 it varies from 0.4 to 2.9.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
ICEF2004-909-FINAL.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo completo
Tipologia:
Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione
780.19 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
780.19 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris