BackgroundEvidence suggests that LPA risk genotypes are a possible contributor to the clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). This study aimed at determining the prevalence of LPA risk variants in adult individuals with FH enrolled in the Italian LIPIGEN (Lipid Transport Disorders Italian Genetic Network) study, with (FH/M+) or without (FH/M-) a causative genetic variant. Methods and ResultsAn lp(a) [lipoprotein(a)] genetic score was calculated by summing the number risk-increasing alleles inherited at rs3798220 and rs10455872 variants. Overall, in the 4.6% of 1695 patients with clinically diagnosed FH, the phenotype was not explained by a monogenic or polygenic cause but by genotype associated with high lp(a) levels. Among 765 subjects with FH/M- and 930 subjects with FH/M+, 133 (17.4%) and 95 (10.2%) were characterized by 1 copy of either rs10455872 or rs3798220 or 2 copies of either rs10455872 or rs3798220 (lp(a) score >= 1). Subjects with FH/M- also had lower mean levels of pretreatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol than individuals with FH/M+ (t test for difference in means between FH/M- and FH/M+ groups <0.0001); however, subjects with FH/M- and lp(a) score >= 1 had higher mean (SD) pretreatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (223.47 [50.40] mg/dL) compared with subjects with FH/M- and lp(a) score=0 (219.38 [54.54] mg/dL for), although not statistically significant. The adjustment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels based on lp(a) concentration reduced from 68% to 42% the proportion of subjects with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level >= 190 mg/dL (or from 68% to 50%, considering a more conservative formula). ConclusionsOur study supports the importance of measuring lp(a) to perform the diagnosis of FH appropriately and to exclude that the observed phenotype is driven by elevated levels of lp(a) before performing the genetic test for FH.
Lipoprotein(a) Genotype Influences the Clinical Diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia / Olmastroni, Elena; Gazzotti, Marta; Averna, Maurizio; Arca, Marcello; Tarugi, Patrizia; Calandra, Sebastiano; Bertolini, Stefano; Catapano, Alberico L; Casula, Manuela; Marcello, Arca; Laura, D'Erasmo; Maurizio, Averna; Angelo Baldassare Cefalù, ; Andrea, Bartuli; Paola Sabrina Buonuomo, ; Andrea, Benso; Guglielmo, Beccuti; Giacomo, Biasucci; Maria Elena Capra, ; Gianni, Biolo; Pierandrea, Vinci; Luca, Bonanni; Claudio, Borghi; Sergio, D'Addato; Antonio Carlo Bossi, ; Giancarla, Meregalli; Adriana, Branchi; Paolo, Calabrò; Carubbi, Francesca; Nascimbeni, Fabio; Francesco, Cipollone; Marco, Bucci; Nadia, Citroni; Maria Del Ben, ; Francesco, Baratta; Massimo, Federici; Martina, Montagna; Claudio, Ferri; Serena, Notargiacomo; Anna Maria Fiorenza, ; Emanuela, Colombo; Giuliana, Fortunato; Maria Donata Di Taranto, ; Andrea, Giaccari; Simona, Moffa; Francesco, Giorgino; Sergio Di Molfetta, ; Ornella, Guardamagna; Luisa De Sanctis, ; Arcangelo, Iannuzzi; Raimondo, Cavallaro; Gabriella, Iannuzzo; Marco, Gentile; Iughetti, Lorenzo; Bruzzi, Patrizia; Salvatore, Lia; Alessandro, Lupi; Giuseppe, Mandraffino; Arianna, Toscano; Rossella, Marcucci; Martina, Berteotti; Lorenzo, Maroni; Fabiana, Locatelli; Tiziana, Montalcini; Giuliana, Mombelli; Sandro, Muntoni; Davide, Baldera; Gianfranco, Parati; Angelina, Passaro; Valerio, Pecchioli; Cristina, Pederiva; Giuseppe, Banderali; Antonio, Pipolo; Debora, D'Elia; Matteo, Pirro; Vanessa, Bianconi; Livia, Pisciotta; Elena, Formisano; Francesco, Purrello; Roberto, Scicali; Elena, Repetti; Elena, Cantino; Elisabetta, Rinaldi; Elena, Sani; Riccardo, Sarzani; Francesco, Spannella; Francesco, Sbrana; Beatrice Dal Pino, ; Patrizia, Suppressa; Cocco, VERONICA MARGHERITA; Chiara, Trenti; Emanuele Alberto Negri, ; Josè Pablo Werba, ; Alessandra, Romandini; Sabina, Zambon; Alberto, Zambon; Maria Grazia Zenti, ; Giulia, Fainelli; Fabio, Pellegatta; Liliana, Grigore; Katia, Bonomo; Eleonora, Capatti; Ada, Cutolo; Fabio, Fimiani; Simonetta, Genovesi; Sandro, Inchiostro; Chiara, Pavanello; Roberta, Pujia; Alon, Schaffer; Stefano, Bertolini; CALANDRA BUONAURA, Sebastiano; Alberico Luigi Catapano, ; Manuela, Casula; Elena, Olmastroni; Tarugi, Patrizia Maria; Marta, Gazzotti; Federica, Galimberti. - In: JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION. CARDIOVASCULAR AND CEREBROVASCULAR DISEASE. - ISSN 2047-9980. - 12:10(2023), pp. e029223-e029223. [10.1161/JAHA.122.029223]
Lipoprotein(a) Genotype Influences the Clinical Diagnosis of Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Tarugi, Patrizia;Calandra, Sebastiano;Francesca Carubbi;Fabio Nascimbeni;Lorenzo Iughetti;Patrizia Bruzzi;Veronica Cocco;Sebastiano Calandra;Patrizia Tarugi;
2023
Abstract
BackgroundEvidence suggests that LPA risk genotypes are a possible contributor to the clinical diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). This study aimed at determining the prevalence of LPA risk variants in adult individuals with FH enrolled in the Italian LIPIGEN (Lipid Transport Disorders Italian Genetic Network) study, with (FH/M+) or without (FH/M-) a causative genetic variant. Methods and ResultsAn lp(a) [lipoprotein(a)] genetic score was calculated by summing the number risk-increasing alleles inherited at rs3798220 and rs10455872 variants. Overall, in the 4.6% of 1695 patients with clinically diagnosed FH, the phenotype was not explained by a monogenic or polygenic cause but by genotype associated with high lp(a) levels. Among 765 subjects with FH/M- and 930 subjects with FH/M+, 133 (17.4%) and 95 (10.2%) were characterized by 1 copy of either rs10455872 or rs3798220 or 2 copies of either rs10455872 or rs3798220 (lp(a) score >= 1). Subjects with FH/M- also had lower mean levels of pretreatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol than individuals with FH/M+ (t test for difference in means between FH/M- and FH/M+ groups <0.0001); however, subjects with FH/M- and lp(a) score >= 1 had higher mean (SD) pretreatment low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (223.47 [50.40] mg/dL) compared with subjects with FH/M- and lp(a) score=0 (219.38 [54.54] mg/dL for), although not statistically significant. The adjustment of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels based on lp(a) concentration reduced from 68% to 42% the proportion of subjects with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level >= 190 mg/dL (or from 68% to 50%, considering a more conservative formula). ConclusionsOur study supports the importance of measuring lp(a) to perform the diagnosis of FH appropriately and to exclude that the observed phenotype is driven by elevated levels of lp(a) before performing the genetic test for FH.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
JAHA.122.029223.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
297.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
297.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris