Work function in Si1-xGex heterostructures with Ge content in the 6% to 49% range was studied with high energy resolution by combining Kelvin force microscopy and X-ray photoelectron emission microscopy. Although the two methods are based on distinct physical mechanisms, we show that both techniques give the same work function differences between each Si1-xGex layer, as small as 20 meV. To detect such small work function differences, we put in evidence the necessity of preparing the Si1-xGex sample surface with polishing, HF etching and Ar+ sputtering. Such surface preparation allows, in principle, to reduce the deleterious influence of surface states, coming for instance from carbon atoms or native oxide, on quantitative work function extraction. We show in this paper that even after such a sample surface preparation, a strong band bending can be present, which causes a contrast inversion on the surface of the material and yields an artificially lower surface work function with respect to theoretical values. By using density functional theory simulations, we demonstrate that such inversion is likely due to residual carbon present on the surface.
Work Function Measurement of Silicon Germanium Heterostructures Combining Kelvin Force Microscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Emission Microscopy / Pouch, Sylvain; Amato, Michele; Bertocchi, Matteo; Ossicini, Stefano; Chevalier, Nicolas; Melin, Thierry; Hartmann, Jean Michel; Renault, Olivier; Delaye, Vincent; Mariolle, Denis; Borowik, Lukasz. - In: JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY. C. - ISSN 1932-7447. - STAMPA. - 119:47(2015), pp. 26776-26782. [10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b09278]
Work Function Measurement of Silicon Germanium Heterostructures Combining Kelvin Force Microscopy and X-ray Photoelectron Emission Microscopy
BERTOCCHI, MATTEO;OSSICINI, Stefano;
2015
Abstract
Work function in Si1-xGex heterostructures with Ge content in the 6% to 49% range was studied with high energy resolution by combining Kelvin force microscopy and X-ray photoelectron emission microscopy. Although the two methods are based on distinct physical mechanisms, we show that both techniques give the same work function differences between each Si1-xGex layer, as small as 20 meV. To detect such small work function differences, we put in evidence the necessity of preparing the Si1-xGex sample surface with polishing, HF etching and Ar+ sputtering. Such surface preparation allows, in principle, to reduce the deleterious influence of surface states, coming for instance from carbon atoms or native oxide, on quantitative work function extraction. We show in this paper that even after such a sample surface preparation, a strong band bending can be present, which causes a contrast inversion on the surface of the material and yields an artificially lower surface work function with respect to theoretical values. By using density functional theory simulations, we demonstrate that such inversion is likely due to residual carbon present on the surface.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
jpccsige.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
1.94 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.94 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris