OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of women affected by functional hypothalamic secondary amenorrhea (FHSA) or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to adapt to stress. DESIGN: Controlled clinical study. Setting: University hospital. PATIENT(s): Thirty-one patients affected by FHSA, 29 patients with PCOS, and 30 eumenorrheic women. INTERVENTION(s): The subjects took the Stroop Color Word (Stroop CW) test and underwent blood sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(s): Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and serum cortisol levels. RESULT(s): The healthy controls had better Stroop CW scores than patients with FHSA. Serum cortisol levels significantly increased during Stroop CW with respect to the baseline in patients with FHSA or PCOS but not in the healthy controls. The SBP, DBP, and HR of the controls as well as SBP and DBP of patients with PCOS were significantly higher than those measured in patients with FHSA both at the baseline and during Stroop CW. CONCLUSION(s): Patients with FHSA do not cope as well as healthy patients, and their autonomic response to stress is worse than both controls and patients with PCOS.

Autonomic and neuroendocrine responses to stress in patients with functional hypothalamic secondary amenorrhea / A., Gallinelli; M. L., Matteo; Volpe, Annibale; Facchinetti, Fabio. - In: FERTILITY AND STERILITY. - ISSN 0015-0282. - STAMPA. - 73:4(2000), pp. 812-816. [10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00601-9]

Autonomic and neuroendocrine responses to stress in patients with functional hypothalamic secondary amenorrhea.

VOLPE, Annibale;FACCHINETTI, Fabio
2000

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of women affected by functional hypothalamic secondary amenorrhea (FHSA) or polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to adapt to stress. DESIGN: Controlled clinical study. Setting: University hospital. PATIENT(s): Thirty-one patients affected by FHSA, 29 patients with PCOS, and 30 eumenorrheic women. INTERVENTION(s): The subjects took the Stroop Color Word (Stroop CW) test and underwent blood sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(s): Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and serum cortisol levels. RESULT(s): The healthy controls had better Stroop CW scores than patients with FHSA. Serum cortisol levels significantly increased during Stroop CW with respect to the baseline in patients with FHSA or PCOS but not in the healthy controls. The SBP, DBP, and HR of the controls as well as SBP and DBP of patients with PCOS were significantly higher than those measured in patients with FHSA both at the baseline and during Stroop CW. CONCLUSION(s): Patients with FHSA do not cope as well as healthy patients, and their autonomic response to stress is worse than both controls and patients with PCOS.
2000
73
4
812
816
Autonomic and neuroendocrine responses to stress in patients with functional hypothalamic secondary amenorrhea / A., Gallinelli; M. L., Matteo; Volpe, Annibale; Facchinetti, Fabio. - In: FERTILITY AND STERILITY. - ISSN 0015-0282. - STAMPA. - 73:4(2000), pp. 812-816. [10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00601-9]
A., Gallinelli; M. L., Matteo; Volpe, Annibale; Facchinetti, Fabio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Autonomic and neuroendocrine responses to stress in patients with functional hypothalamic secondary amenorrhea..pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione 712.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
712.1 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
PIIS0015028299006019.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 86.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
86.5 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/739453
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact