This paper aims at reinforcing the linguistic component of the analysis of legal discourse, by carrying out a corpus-based genre analysis on a sample of 40 judgments. First of all, the results of the investigation of the genre structure of judgments will be presented. The comparative approach adopted will show that the differences between European and English / Irish judgments mainly concern the generic move Arguing the case. Secondly, analysis will concentrate in more detail on one of the most frequent tools used in the discursive construction of argumentation within the aforementioned move, i.e. the widely spread reporting verb HOLD. A study of its concordances suggests that it is used in all types of judgments as a meta-argumentative operator signalling either an authoritative stance taken by the Court or an equally authoritative reported argumentation of another judge or court.
The Construction of Argumentation in Judicial Texts: Combining a Genre and a Corpus Perspective / Mazzi, Davide. - In: ARGUMENTATION. - ISSN 0920-427X. - STAMPA. - 14(2007), pp. 21-38.
Data di pubblicazione: | 2007 |
Titolo: | The Construction of Argumentation in Judicial Texts: Combining a Genre and a Corpus Perspective |
Autore/i: | Mazzi, Davide |
Autore/i UNIMORE: | |
Rivista: | |
Volume: | 14 |
Pagina iniziale: | 21 |
Pagina finale: | 38 |
Codice identificativo Scopus: | 2-s2.0-34548797540 |
Citazione: | The Construction of Argumentation in Judicial Texts: Combining a Genre and a Corpus Perspective / Mazzi, Davide. - In: ARGUMENTATION. - ISSN 0920-427X. - STAMPA. - 14(2007), pp. 21-38. |
Tipologia | Articolo su rivista |
File in questo prodotto:

I documenti presenti in Iris Unimore sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia, salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris