Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution (PPP-AR) has emerged as a viable alternative to traditional network-based GNSS processing for crustal deformation monitoring and velocity field estimation. It provides high-precision daily coordinate solutions with simpler logistics, particularly for densifying velocity fields in regions lacking dense GNSS infrastructure. This study evaluates whether long-term velocity estimates derived from independent operational GNSS processing chains remain mutually consistent for regional geodynamic applications. We applied four processing strategies to 79 high-quality continuous GNSS stations in Southern Italy over the period 2017-2024: a Bernese double-difference network solution used as reference, Bernese PPP-AR, PRIDE PPP-AR, and the Nevada Geodetic Laboratory (NGL) PPP-AR solution derived from the GipsyX processing pipeline. The daily coordinate series preserve the realistic differences among the processing chains, while the subsequent velocity estimation was performed with a common HectorP workflow. A Bland-Altman screening identified 10 outlier stations, and the final inter-comparison is based on the remaining 69 stations (87.3% of the network). The results show that horizontal velocity components derived from PPP-AR agree with the network solution at sub-millimeter-per-year levels, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.95, indicating strong coherence between the PPP-AR and network-derived horizontal velocity fields. In addition, vertical velocity estimates exhibit processing-strategy-dependent differences on the order of 1 mm yr-1 among PPP-AR solutions and relative to the network, indicating that careful interpretation is required for vertical rates. This study presents a systematic comparison of operational PPP-AR velocity solutions and a double-difference reference solution, demonstrating that complete processing-chain differences can introduce vertical effects comparable to those between PPP-AR and network processing. The findings support the practical maturity of PPP-AR for horizontal velocity field densification, while showing that vertical rates remain sensitive to processing strategy at the similar to 1 mm yr-1 level.

Assessing the Accuracy of GNSS Velocities: A Multi-Software Comparison of Differential and PPP-AR Solutions / Mokhtari, S., Zanutta, A., Negusini, M., Cappuccio, M., Del Ciondolo, G., Forina, D., Capra, A., Vittuari, L.. - In: GEOMATICS. - ISSN 2673-7418. - 6:3(2026), pp. 63-63. [10.3390/geomatics6030063]

Assessing the Accuracy of GNSS Velocities: A Multi-Software Comparison of Differential and PPP-AR Solutions

Negusini M.;Forina D.;Capra A.;Vittuari L.
2026

Abstract

Precise Point Positioning with Ambiguity Resolution (PPP-AR) has emerged as a viable alternative to traditional network-based GNSS processing for crustal deformation monitoring and velocity field estimation. It provides high-precision daily coordinate solutions with simpler logistics, particularly for densifying velocity fields in regions lacking dense GNSS infrastructure. This study evaluates whether long-term velocity estimates derived from independent operational GNSS processing chains remain mutually consistent for regional geodynamic applications. We applied four processing strategies to 79 high-quality continuous GNSS stations in Southern Italy over the period 2017-2024: a Bernese double-difference network solution used as reference, Bernese PPP-AR, PRIDE PPP-AR, and the Nevada Geodetic Laboratory (NGL) PPP-AR solution derived from the GipsyX processing pipeline. The daily coordinate series preserve the realistic differences among the processing chains, while the subsequent velocity estimation was performed with a common HectorP workflow. A Bland-Altman screening identified 10 outlier stations, and the final inter-comparison is based on the remaining 69 stations (87.3% of the network). The results show that horizontal velocity components derived from PPP-AR agree with the network solution at sub-millimeter-per-year levels, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.95, indicating strong coherence between the PPP-AR and network-derived horizontal velocity fields. In addition, vertical velocity estimates exhibit processing-strategy-dependent differences on the order of 1 mm yr-1 among PPP-AR solutions and relative to the network, indicating that careful interpretation is required for vertical rates. This study presents a systematic comparison of operational PPP-AR velocity solutions and a double-difference reference solution, demonstrating that complete processing-chain differences can introduce vertical effects comparable to those between PPP-AR and network processing. The findings support the practical maturity of PPP-AR for horizontal velocity field densification, while showing that vertical rates remain sensitive to processing strategy at the similar to 1 mm yr-1 level.
2026
6
3
63
63
Assessing the Accuracy of GNSS Velocities: A Multi-Software Comparison of Differential and PPP-AR Solutions / Mokhtari, S., Zanutta, A., Negusini, M., Cappuccio, M., Del Ciondolo, G., Forina, D., Capra, A., Vittuari, L.. - In: GEOMATICS. - ISSN 2673-7418. - 6:3(2026), pp. 63-63. [10.3390/geomatics6030063]
Mokhtari, S.; Zanutta, A.; Negusini, M.; Cappuccio, M.; Del Ciondolo, G.; Forina, D.; Capra, A.; Vittuari, L.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
geomatics-06-00063.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza: [IR] creative-commons
Dimensione 4.11 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.11 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1416228
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact