Purpose: To study retinal function in asymptomatic Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and no clinical signs of diabetic macular edema. Methods: Thirty-six consecutive Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and no diabetic macular edema and 28 healthy controls underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. Results: Seventy-one eyes (17 patients with Type 1 and 19 with Type 2 diabetes) were tested, and data from 36 (17 Type 1 and 19 Type 2) eyes were analyzed. Mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.00 +/- 0.01 logMAR and 0.00 +/- 0.02 logMAR for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.075). Mean central foveal thickness was 234.5 +/- 13.7 mm and 256.3 +/- 12.7 mm for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.04); the central foveal thickness was statistically different compared with the control groups (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Mean retinal sensitivity was 18.9 +/- 0.5 dB and 17.7 +/- 0.4 dB for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively; it was statistically different compared with control groups (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: We demonstrated a significantly reduced sensitivity in both nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy groups without diabetic macular edema compared with healthy controls; this reduction was greater in Type 2 diabetic patients. Central foveal thickness was increased in all diabetic patients compared with healthy controls, despite the absence of diabetic macular edema.

Purpose: To study retinal function in asymptomatic Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and no clinical signs of diabetic macular edema. Methods: Thirty-six consecutive Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and no diabetic macular edema and 28 healthy controls underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. Results: Seventy-one eyes (17 patients with Type 1 and 19 with Type 2 diabetes) were tested, and data from 36 (17 Type 1 and 19 Type 2) eyes were analyzed. Mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.00 +/- 0.01 logMAR and 0.00 +/- 0.02 logMAR for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.075). Mean central foveal thickness was 234.5 +/- 13.7 mm and 256.3 +/- 12.7 mm for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.04); the central foveal thickness was statistically different compared with the control groups (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Mean retinal sensitivity was 18.9 +/- 0.5 dB and 17.7 +/- 0.4 dB for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively; it was statistically different compared with control groups (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: We demonstrated a significantly reduced sensitivity in both nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy groups without diabetic macular edema compared with healthy controls; this reduction was greater in Type 2 diabetic patients. Central foveal thickness was increased in all diabetic patients compared with healthy controls, despite the absence of diabetic macular edema.

MACULAR DYSFUNCTION IS COMMON IN BOTH TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS WITHOUT MACULAR EDEMA / De Benedetto, U., Querques, G., Lattanzio, R., Borrelli, E., Triolo, G., Maestranzi, G., Calori, G., Querques, L., Bandello, F.. - In: RETINA. - ISSN 0275-004X. - 34:11(2014), pp. 2171-2177.

MACULAR DYSFUNCTION IS COMMON IN BOTH TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS WITHOUT MACULAR EDEMA

QUERQUES , GIUSEPPE;
2014

Abstract

Purpose: To study retinal function in asymptomatic Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR) and no clinical signs of diabetic macular edema. Methods: Thirty-six consecutive Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients with nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy and no diabetic macular edema and 28 healthy controls underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, including spectral domain optical coherence tomography and microperimetry. Results: Seventy-one eyes (17 patients with Type 1 and 19 with Type 2 diabetes) were tested, and data from 36 (17 Type 1 and 19 Type 2) eyes were analyzed. Mean best-corrected visual acuity was 0.00 +/- 0.01 logMAR and 0.00 +/- 0.02 logMAR for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.075). Mean central foveal thickness was 234.5 +/- 13.7 mm and 256.3 +/- 12.7 mm for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively (P = 0.04); the central foveal thickness was statistically different compared with the control groups (P = 0.04 and P = 0.01, respectively). Mean retinal sensitivity was 18.9 +/- 0.5 dB and 17.7 +/- 0.4 dB for Type 1 and Type 2 diabetic patients, respectively; it was statistically different compared with control groups (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). Conclusion: We demonstrated a significantly reduced sensitivity in both nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy groups without diabetic macular edema compared with healthy controls; this reduction was greater in Type 2 diabetic patients. Central foveal thickness was increased in all diabetic patients compared with healthy controls, despite the absence of diabetic macular edema.
2014
34
11
2171
2177
MACULAR DYSFUNCTION IS COMMON IN BOTH TYPE 1 AND TYPE 2 DIABETIC PATIENTS WITHOUT MACULAR EDEMA / De Benedetto, U., Querques, G., Lattanzio, R., Borrelli, E., Triolo, G., Maestranzi, G., Calori, G., Querques, L., Bandello, F.. - In: RETINA. - ISSN 0275-004X. - 34:11(2014), pp. 2171-2177.
De Benedetto, U; Querques, Giuseppe; Lattanzio, R; Borrelli, E; Triolo, G; Maestranzi, G; Calori, G; Querques, L; Bandello, Francesco
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1404401
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 32
social impact