Aims Operating on patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) is based on ACC/AHA or ESC/EACTS guidelines. Doubts persist on best surgical indications and their potential association with postoperative survival loss. We sought to investigate whether guideline-based indications lead to late postoperative survival loss in DMR patients. Methods and results We analysed outcome of 2833 patients from the Mitral Regurgitation International Database registry undergoing surgical correction of DMR. Patients were stratified by surgical indications: Class I trigger (symptoms, left ventricular end-systolic diameter >= 40 mm, or left ventricular ejection fraction < 60%, n = 1677), isolated Class IIa trigger [atrial fibrillation (AF), pulmonary hypertension (PH), or left atrial diameter >= 55 mm, n = 568], or no trigger (n = 588). Postoperative survival was compared after matching for clinical differences. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was analysed. During a median 8.5-year follow-up, 603 deaths occurred. Long-term postoperative survival was lower with Class I trigger than in Class IIa trigger and no trigger (71.4 +/- 1.9, 84.3 +/- 2.3, and 88.9 +/- 1.9% at 10 years, P < 0.001). Having at least one Class I criterion led to excess mortality (P < 0.001), while several Class I criteria conferred additional death risk [hazard ratio (HR): 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-1.66]. Isolated Class IIa triggers conferred an excess mortality risk vs. those without (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.00-2.13, P = 0.05). Among these patients, isolated PH led to decreased postoperative survival vs. those without (83.7 +/- 2.8% vs. 89.3 +/- 1.6%, P = 0.011), with the same pattern observed for AF (81.8 +/- 5.0% vs. 88.3 +/- 1.5%, P = 0.023). According to RMST analysis, compare to those operated on without triggers, operating on Class I trigger patients led to 9.4-month survival loss (P < 0.001) and operating on isolated Class IIa trigger patients displayed 4.9-month survival loss (P = 0.001) after 10 years. Conclusion Waiting for the onset of Class I or isolated Class IIa triggers before operating on DMR patients is associated with postoperative survival loss. These data encourage an early surgical strategy.

Survival loss linked to guideline-based indications for degenerative mitral regurgitation surgery / Vancraeynest, D.; Pouleur, A. C.; De Meester, C.; Pasquet, A.; Gerber, B.; Michelena, H.; Benfari, G.; Essayagh, B.; Tribouilloy, C.; Rusinaru, D.; Grigioni, F.; Barbieri, A.; Bursi, F.; Avierinos, J. F.; Guerra, F.; Biagini, E.; Yeo, K. K.; Ewe, S. H.; Lee, A. P. W.; Vanoverschelde, J. L. J.; Enriquez-Sarano, M.; Benfari, G.; Essayagh, B.; Antoine, C.; Malouf, J. F.; Michelena, H.; Nkomo, V. T.; Enriquez-Sarano, M. L.; Guerra, F.; Barbarossa, A.; Russo, A. D.; Wong, R.; Wan, S.; Chow, J.; Fan, Y.; Lee, A. P. W.; Ewe, S. H.; Yeo, K. K.; Keh, Y. S.; Hamid, N.; Pin, D. Z.; Trojette, F.; Touati, G.; Remadi, J. P.; Poulain, H. J.; Tribouilloy, C.; Ditaranto, R.; Caponetti, G.; Savini, C.; Pacini, D.; Biagini, E.; Chello, M.; Nusca, A.; Melfi, R.; Ussia, G. P.; Grigioni, F.; De Meester, C.; El Khoury, G.; Gerber, B. L.; Pasquet, A.; Vancraeynest, D.; Vanoverschelde, J. L.; Collart, F.; Théron, A.; Avierinos, J. F.; Barbieri, A.; Bursi, F.; Mantovani, F.; Modena, M. G.; Boriani, G.; Benfari, G.; Rossi, A.; Onorati, F.; Ribichini, F. L.. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING. - ISSN 2047-2404. - 25:12(2024), pp. 1703-1711. [10.1093/ehjci/jeae176]

Survival loss linked to guideline-based indications for degenerative mitral regurgitation surgery

Barbieri A.;Bursi F.;Biagini E.;Biagini E.;Barbieri A.;Bursi F.;Modena M. G.;Boriani G.;
2024

Abstract

Aims Operating on patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) is based on ACC/AHA or ESC/EACTS guidelines. Doubts persist on best surgical indications and their potential association with postoperative survival loss. We sought to investigate whether guideline-based indications lead to late postoperative survival loss in DMR patients. Methods and results We analysed outcome of 2833 patients from the Mitral Regurgitation International Database registry undergoing surgical correction of DMR. Patients were stratified by surgical indications: Class I trigger (symptoms, left ventricular end-systolic diameter >= 40 mm, or left ventricular ejection fraction < 60%, n = 1677), isolated Class IIa trigger [atrial fibrillation (AF), pulmonary hypertension (PH), or left atrial diameter >= 55 mm, n = 568], or no trigger (n = 588). Postoperative survival was compared after matching for clinical differences. Restricted mean survival time (RMST) was analysed. During a median 8.5-year follow-up, 603 deaths occurred. Long-term postoperative survival was lower with Class I trigger than in Class IIa trigger and no trigger (71.4 +/- 1.9, 84.3 +/- 2.3, and 88.9 +/- 1.9% at 10 years, P < 0.001). Having at least one Class I criterion led to excess mortality (P < 0.001), while several Class I criteria conferred additional death risk [hazard ratio (HR): 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-1.66]. Isolated Class IIa triggers conferred an excess mortality risk vs. those without (HR: 1.46, 95% CI: 1.00-2.13, P = 0.05). Among these patients, isolated PH led to decreased postoperative survival vs. those without (83.7 +/- 2.8% vs. 89.3 +/- 1.6%, P = 0.011), with the same pattern observed for AF (81.8 +/- 5.0% vs. 88.3 +/- 1.5%, P = 0.023). According to RMST analysis, compare to those operated on without triggers, operating on Class I trigger patients led to 9.4-month survival loss (P < 0.001) and operating on isolated Class IIa trigger patients displayed 4.9-month survival loss (P = 0.001) after 10 years. Conclusion Waiting for the onset of Class I or isolated Class IIa triggers before operating on DMR patients is associated with postoperative survival loss. These data encourage an early surgical strategy.
2024
25
12
1703
1711
Survival loss linked to guideline-based indications for degenerative mitral regurgitation surgery / Vancraeynest, D.; Pouleur, A. C.; De Meester, C.; Pasquet, A.; Gerber, B.; Michelena, H.; Benfari, G.; Essayagh, B.; Tribouilloy, C.; Rusinaru, D.; Grigioni, F.; Barbieri, A.; Bursi, F.; Avierinos, J. F.; Guerra, F.; Biagini, E.; Yeo, K. K.; Ewe, S. H.; Lee, A. P. W.; Vanoverschelde, J. L. J.; Enriquez-Sarano, M.; Benfari, G.; Essayagh, B.; Antoine, C.; Malouf, J. F.; Michelena, H.; Nkomo, V. T.; Enriquez-Sarano, M. L.; Guerra, F.; Barbarossa, A.; Russo, A. D.; Wong, R.; Wan, S.; Chow, J.; Fan, Y.; Lee, A. P. W.; Ewe, S. H.; Yeo, K. K.; Keh, Y. S.; Hamid, N.; Pin, D. Z.; Trojette, F.; Touati, G.; Remadi, J. P.; Poulain, H. J.; Tribouilloy, C.; Ditaranto, R.; Caponetti, G.; Savini, C.; Pacini, D.; Biagini, E.; Chello, M.; Nusca, A.; Melfi, R.; Ussia, G. P.; Grigioni, F.; De Meester, C.; El Khoury, G.; Gerber, B. L.; Pasquet, A.; Vancraeynest, D.; Vanoverschelde, J. L.; Collart, F.; Théron, A.; Avierinos, J. F.; Barbieri, A.; Bursi, F.; Mantovani, F.; Modena, M. G.; Boriani, G.; Benfari, G.; Rossi, A.; Onorati, F.; Ribichini, F. L.. - In: EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING. - ISSN 2047-2404. - 25:12(2024), pp. 1703-1711. [10.1093/ehjci/jeae176]
Vancraeynest, D.; Pouleur, A. C.; De Meester, C.; Pasquet, A.; Gerber, B.; Michelena, H.; Benfari, G.; Essayagh, B.; Tribouilloy, C.; Rusinaru, D.; Gr...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1365369
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact