This study examines how diversity shapes creative platform workers’ access to and exercise of voice within the precarious landscape of platform capitalism. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of capital and field, we explore unique qualitative materials collected from 40Brazilian literary content creators. The findings show that creative platform workers’ access to and exercise of voice is based on three conditions of privilege: playing the rules of the game; drawing on bundles of resources; and leveraging intermediation capacity. We identify four forms of voice among creative platform workers – shielding, demonstrating, ingroup-focused gatekeeping and affirmative voices – and highlight the relational dynamics of power in this context. This research contributes to understanding diversity in creative platform work through a privilege lens, thereby revealing the complex dynamics of power and dependence that creative platform workers experience with different industry stakeholders. This study contributes to the literature about diversity and voice by: showing that online prestige alone does not ensure voice opportunities; unveiling the variety of targets and agents in the four forms of voice in creative platform work; and highlighting the limitations of collective voice in challenging existing privilege and disadvantage systems

Walking the Digital Tightrope: Diversity and voice in creative platform work / Silveira Reis, Rosana; Curzi, Ylenia; Bolzani, Daniela. - In: ORGANIZATION STUDIES. - ISSN 0170-8406. - 46:1(2025), pp. 35-61. [10.1177/01708406241290032]

Walking the Digital Tightrope: Diversity and voice in creative platform work

Ylenia Curzi;
2025

Abstract

This study examines how diversity shapes creative platform workers’ access to and exercise of voice within the precarious landscape of platform capitalism. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of capital and field, we explore unique qualitative materials collected from 40Brazilian literary content creators. The findings show that creative platform workers’ access to and exercise of voice is based on three conditions of privilege: playing the rules of the game; drawing on bundles of resources; and leveraging intermediation capacity. We identify four forms of voice among creative platform workers – shielding, demonstrating, ingroup-focused gatekeeping and affirmative voices – and highlight the relational dynamics of power in this context. This research contributes to understanding diversity in creative platform work through a privilege lens, thereby revealing the complex dynamics of power and dependence that creative platform workers experience with different industry stakeholders. This study contributes to the literature about diversity and voice by: showing that online prestige alone does not ensure voice opportunities; unveiling the variety of targets and agents in the four forms of voice in creative platform work; and highlighting the limitations of collective voice in challenging existing privilege and disadvantage systems
2025
22-ott-2024
46
1
35
61
Walking the Digital Tightrope: Diversity and voice in creative platform work / Silveira Reis, Rosana; Curzi, Ylenia; Bolzani, Daniela. - In: ORGANIZATION STUDIES. - ISSN 0170-8406. - 46:1(2025), pp. 35-61. [10.1177/01708406241290032]
Silveira Reis, Rosana; Curzi, Ylenia; Bolzani, Daniela
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
reis_curzi_bolzani_2024-walking-the-digital-tightrope.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: pdf editoriale (online first)+online_supplemental material
Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 896.1 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
896.1 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1363288
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact