This article proposes a reflection on the meanings, models and prac- tices aimed at supporting and promoting inclusive processes in universities. A review of recent literature on inclusive cultures and practices in higher education confirms the idea of inclusion as a “universal value”, albeit with different declina- tions, in terms of intentions, priorities and operativeness, as in the case of didactics. In general, inclusive teaching is one of the indicators of a university’s inclusive- ness and innovativeness, even if a ‘double track’ remains. The framework of the ‘inclusive university as a complex ecosystem between economics and ecology [56] has guided the construction of an operational framework, consistent with an integrated ecological-relational vision of the inclusive model, and the definition of a set of related indicators that characterize inclusive teaching – specialized for all, in order to support processes that foster the collective construction of inclusive universities [1, 12]. In line with this model, two schemes have been developed for the defini- tion of the “original” model of inclusion and for the implementation of inclusive and innovative universities (integrated model) that allow for the integration and focusing of different elements, dimensions and levels, in a single framework, con- sistent with an idea of special and inclusive pedagogy and didactics [10], and with the ecological-relational model. Within this model, the increasing attention paid to new technological tools is reconceptualized as a valid support for the promotion of authentically inclusive education. Tools and technologies find an epistemological position

An Ecological-Integrated Framework for an Inclusive Academia / Damiani, Paola; Guaraldi, Giacomo; Genovese, Elisabetta; Lotti, Antonella. - 2076 CCIS:(2024), pp. 606-624. [10.1007/978-3-031-67351-1_40]

An Ecological-Integrated Framework for an Inclusive Academia

Paola Damiani;Giacomo Guaraldi;Elisabetta Genovese;Antonella Lotti.
2024

Abstract

This article proposes a reflection on the meanings, models and prac- tices aimed at supporting and promoting inclusive processes in universities. A review of recent literature on inclusive cultures and practices in higher education confirms the idea of inclusion as a “universal value”, albeit with different declina- tions, in terms of intentions, priorities and operativeness, as in the case of didactics. In general, inclusive teaching is one of the indicators of a university’s inclusive- ness and innovativeness, even if a ‘double track’ remains. The framework of the ‘inclusive university as a complex ecosystem between economics and ecology [56] has guided the construction of an operational framework, consistent with an integrated ecological-relational vision of the inclusive model, and the definition of a set of related indicators that characterize inclusive teaching – specialized for all, in order to support processes that foster the collective construction of inclusive universities [1, 12]. In line with this model, two schemes have been developed for the defini- tion of the “original” model of inclusion and for the implementation of inclusive and innovative universities (integrated model) that allow for the integration and focusing of different elements, dimensions and levels, in a single framework, con- sistent with an idea of special and inclusive pedagogy and didactics [10], and with the ecological-relational model. Within this model, the increasing attention paid to new technological tools is reconceptualized as a valid support for the promotion of authentically inclusive education. Tools and technologies find an epistemological position
2024
2024
Higher Education, Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online. 5th International Conference, HELMeTO 2023 Foggia, Italy, September 13–15, 2023 Revised Selected Papers
Gabriella Casalino · Raffaele Di Fuccio · Giovanni Fulantelli · Paolo Raviolo · Pier Cesare Rivoltella · Davide Taibi · Giusi Antonia Toto (Eds.)
9783031673504
Spinger
SVIZZERA
An Ecological-Integrated Framework for an Inclusive Academia / Damiani, Paola; Guaraldi, Giacomo; Genovese, Elisabetta; Lotti, Antonella. - 2076 CCIS:(2024), pp. 606-624. [10.1007/978-3-031-67351-1_40]
Damiani, Paola; Guaraldi, Giacomo; Genovese, Elisabetta; Lotti, Antonella
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Springer-pubblicazione Guaraldi.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 55.36 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
55.36 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
SpringerGuaraldi.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.27 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.27 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1358507
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact