Objective: To clarify the mechanistic basis for the success or failure of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Design: We created digital twins based on mechanistic computational models of individual patients with AHRF. Setting: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Systems Medicine Research Network. Subjects: We used individual patient data from 30 moderate-to-severe AHRF patients who had failed high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and subsequently underwent a trial of NIV. Interventions: Using the digital twins, we evaluated lung mechanics, quantified the separate contributions of external support and patient respiratory effort to lung injury indices, and investigated their relative impact on NIV success or failure. Measurements and Main Results: In digital twins of patients who successfully completed / failed NIV, after 2 hours of the trial the mean(SD) of the change in total lung stress was -10.9(6.2) / -0.35(3.38) cmH2O, mechanical power -13.4(12.2) / -1.0(5.4) J/min, and total lung strain 0.02(0.24) / 0.16(0.30). In the digital twins, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) produced by HFNC was similar to that set during NIV. In digital twins of patients who failed NIV versus those who succeeded, intrinsic PEEP was 3.5(0.6) versus 2.3(0.8) cmH2O, inspiratory pressure support was 8.3(5.9) versus 22.3(7.2) cmH2O, and tidal volume was 10.9(1.2) versus 9.4(1.8) ml/kg. In digital twins, successful NIV increased respiratory system compliance +25.0(16.4) ml/cmH2O, lowered inspiratory muscle pressure -9.7(9.6) cmH2O, and reduced the contribution of patient spontaneous breathing to total driving pressure by 57.0%. Conclusions: In digital twins of AHRF patients, successful NIV improved lung mechanics, lowering respiratory effort and indices associated with lung injury. NIV failed in patients for whom only low levels of positive inspiratory pressure support could be applied without risking patient self-inflicted lung injury due to excessive tidal volumes.

Digital twins of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients suggest a mechanistic basis for success and failure of non-invasive ventilation / Weaver, Liam; Shamohammadi, Hossein; Saffaran, Sina; Tonelli, Roberto; Laviola, Marianna; Laffey, John G.; Camporota, Luigi; Scott, Timothy E.; Hardman, Jonathan; Clini, Enrico; Bates, Declan. - In: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0090-3493. - 52:9(2024), pp. e473-e484. [10.1097/CCM.0000000000006337]

Digital twins of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients suggest a mechanistic basis for success and failure of non-invasive ventilation

Roberto Tonelli;Enrico Clini
;
2024

Abstract

Objective: To clarify the mechanistic basis for the success or failure of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). Design: We created digital twins based on mechanistic computational models of individual patients with AHRF. Setting: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Systems Medicine Research Network. Subjects: We used individual patient data from 30 moderate-to-severe AHRF patients who had failed high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and subsequently underwent a trial of NIV. Interventions: Using the digital twins, we evaluated lung mechanics, quantified the separate contributions of external support and patient respiratory effort to lung injury indices, and investigated their relative impact on NIV success or failure. Measurements and Main Results: In digital twins of patients who successfully completed / failed NIV, after 2 hours of the trial the mean(SD) of the change in total lung stress was -10.9(6.2) / -0.35(3.38) cmH2O, mechanical power -13.4(12.2) / -1.0(5.4) J/min, and total lung strain 0.02(0.24) / 0.16(0.30). In the digital twins, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) produced by HFNC was similar to that set during NIV. In digital twins of patients who failed NIV versus those who succeeded, intrinsic PEEP was 3.5(0.6) versus 2.3(0.8) cmH2O, inspiratory pressure support was 8.3(5.9) versus 22.3(7.2) cmH2O, and tidal volume was 10.9(1.2) versus 9.4(1.8) ml/kg. In digital twins, successful NIV increased respiratory system compliance +25.0(16.4) ml/cmH2O, lowered inspiratory muscle pressure -9.7(9.6) cmH2O, and reduced the contribution of patient spontaneous breathing to total driving pressure by 57.0%. Conclusions: In digital twins of AHRF patients, successful NIV improved lung mechanics, lowering respiratory effort and indices associated with lung injury. NIV failed in patients for whom only low levels of positive inspiratory pressure support could be applied without risking patient self-inflicted lung injury due to excessive tidal volumes.
2024
29-mag-2024
52
9
e473
e484
Digital twins of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients suggest a mechanistic basis for success and failure of non-invasive ventilation / Weaver, Liam; Shamohammadi, Hossein; Saffaran, Sina; Tonelli, Roberto; Laviola, Marianna; Laffey, John G.; Camporota, Luigi; Scott, Timothy E.; Hardman, Jonathan; Clini, Enrico; Bates, Declan. - In: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0090-3493. - 52:9(2024), pp. e473-e484. [10.1097/CCM.0000000000006337]
Weaver, Liam; Shamohammadi, Hossein; Saffaran, Sina; Tonelli, Roberto; Laviola, Marianna; Laffey, John G.; Camporota, Luigi; Scott, Timothy E.; Hardma...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bates (Digital-twins of AHRF and NIV outcome-2024).pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.08 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.08 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1340126
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact