A theoretical framework based on the balanced assessment system proposes a definition of formative feedback within an interactionist context and supports the autonomy and active learning of the students involved.The scoping review aims at mapping characteristics of feedback provided by tutors with doctoral students,defining the level, degree,and method of delivery and the ability to promote active learning processes.For the identification and synthesis of the research11.829 contributions were extracted from a query of different aggregators and databases (ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO).From these, 24contributions were included in the analysis by a text mining process following a selection of inclusion/exclusion and critical appraisal carried out by two researchers (KCohen=0.70).From the analysis it is possible to highlight the prevalence of reinforcement feedback distributed during the development of the doctoral process. A need of training also emerges about assessment practices,such as feedback, to support self-assessment and autonomy of the student and to adopt computerized feedback models.

Advisor’s Feedback as assessment practices in Doctoral Programs: a scoping review of empirical research / Marcuccio, Massimo; Silva, Liliana. - In: FORM@RE. - ISSN 1825-7321. - 19:3(2019), pp. 26-47. [10.13128/form-7701]

Advisor’s Feedback as assessment practices in Doctoral Programs: a scoping review of empirical research

Liliana Silva
2019

Abstract

A theoretical framework based on the balanced assessment system proposes a definition of formative feedback within an interactionist context and supports the autonomy and active learning of the students involved.The scoping review aims at mapping characteristics of feedback provided by tutors with doctoral students,defining the level, degree,and method of delivery and the ability to promote active learning processes.For the identification and synthesis of the research11.829 contributions were extracted from a query of different aggregators and databases (ProQuest, Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO).From these, 24contributions were included in the analysis by a text mining process following a selection of inclusion/exclusion and critical appraisal carried out by two researchers (KCohen=0.70).From the analysis it is possible to highlight the prevalence of reinforcement feedback distributed during the development of the doctoral process. A need of training also emerges about assessment practices,such as feedback, to support self-assessment and autonomy of the student and to adopt computerized feedback models.
2019
19
3
26
47
Advisor’s Feedback as assessment practices in Doctoral Programs: a scoping review of empirical research / Marcuccio, Massimo; Silva, Liliana. - In: FORM@RE. - ISSN 1825-7321. - 19:3(2019), pp. 26-47. [10.13128/form-7701]
Marcuccio, Massimo; Silva, Liliana
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Silva&Marcuccio_2019_DEF_AttribuzioneParti_Fig4.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 959.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
959.78 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1329502
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact