NTRODUCTION ― In the past decade the Tunnel Field Effect Transistor (TFET) relying on band-to-band tunneling (BTBT) has emerged as one of the most promising small slope FETs able to achieve a subthreshold swing (SS) below the room temperature 60 mV/dec limit of conventional MOSFET [1]. Many simulation studies attributed to TFETs the potential to outperform conventional MOSFETs in the ultra-low voltage domain (VDD < 0.4 V) in both analog [2-3] and digital [4-7] applications. However, only basic digital and analog circuits have been fabricated up to date, such as current mirrors [8] and inverter gates [9]. As for semiconductor materials, III-V hetero-structure TFETs may be able to achieve a sub-thermal SS in a wide current range and, at the same time, very competitive on currents [1], as demonstrated by a recently fabricated vertical InAs/GaAsSb/GaSb nanowire n-type TFETs [10]. The aim of this work is to benchmark a complementary III-V TFET technology platform against the mainstream FinFET reference, by considering basic building blocks of digital and analog applications. To this purpose, we selected a complementary III-V TFET technology platform designed and optimized using full quantum simulations in [11], where n- and p-type TFET pairs are realized in the same InAs/AlGaSb material system. The use of such devices allowed us to remove the excessively optimistic assumption of perfectly symmetric n- and p-type TFETs, very frequently embraced in previous simulation studies (e.g. in [2, 7]). We present circuit-level simulations performed on current mirrors and inverter-based logic blocks, which are identified as basic topologies representative of the analog and digital design realms, respectively. Similar benchmarking results for the same technology platforms have been obtained by focusing the comparison on more complicated circuit blocks [3], [5] and [6].
Simulations and comparisons of basic analog and digital circuit blocks employing Tunnel FETs and conventional FinFETs / Settino, F.; Strangio, S.; Lanuzza, M.; Crupi, F.; Palestri, P.; Esseni, D.. - 2018-:(2017), pp. 1-3. (Intervento presentato al convegno 5th Berkeley Symposium on Energy Efficient Electronic Systems, E3S 2017 tenutosi a University of California, Berkeley, usa nel 2017) [10.1109/E3S.2017.8246154].
Simulations and comparisons of basic analog and digital circuit blocks employing Tunnel FETs and conventional FinFETs
P. Palestri;D. Esseni
2017
Abstract
NTRODUCTION ― In the past decade the Tunnel Field Effect Transistor (TFET) relying on band-to-band tunneling (BTBT) has emerged as one of the most promising small slope FETs able to achieve a subthreshold swing (SS) below the room temperature 60 mV/dec limit of conventional MOSFET [1]. Many simulation studies attributed to TFETs the potential to outperform conventional MOSFETs in the ultra-low voltage domain (VDD < 0.4 V) in both analog [2-3] and digital [4-7] applications. However, only basic digital and analog circuits have been fabricated up to date, such as current mirrors [8] and inverter gates [9]. As for semiconductor materials, III-V hetero-structure TFETs may be able to achieve a sub-thermal SS in a wide current range and, at the same time, very competitive on currents [1], as demonstrated by a recently fabricated vertical InAs/GaAsSb/GaSb nanowire n-type TFETs [10]. The aim of this work is to benchmark a complementary III-V TFET technology platform against the mainstream FinFET reference, by considering basic building blocks of digital and analog applications. To this purpose, we selected a complementary III-V TFET technology platform designed and optimized using full quantum simulations in [11], where n- and p-type TFET pairs are realized in the same InAs/AlGaSb material system. The use of such devices allowed us to remove the excessively optimistic assumption of perfectly symmetric n- and p-type TFETs, very frequently embraced in previous simulation studies (e.g. in [2, 7]). We present circuit-level simulations performed on current mirrors and inverter-based logic blocks, which are identified as basic topologies representative of the analog and digital design realms, respectively. Similar benchmarking results for the same technology platforms have been obtained by focusing the comparison on more complicated circuit blocks [3], [5] and [6].File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Settino_E3_Berkeley2017_IEEEXplorer.pdf
Accesso riservato
Dimensione
356.64 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
356.64 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris