Often considered a traditional labour intensive activity, in recent years, the solid waste management (SWM) industry has been largely interested in innovation. Nonetheless, the analysis of innovations in the SW industry is frequently confined to process innovation in the disposal segment, neglecting other kinds of innovation – such as product innovation and organizational innovation – in other segments. While several economic theoretical frameworks have been developed for interpreting eco-innovation in general, a specific analysis of innovation in each segment of SWM is still missing, despite the specificities of this sector. To fill this gap, this paper shows how complexity theory can be profitably used to integrate the more traditional neoclassical approach, offering a comprehensive theoretical framework to analyse innovation in the SWM industry from both a market and firm perspective (the neoclassical approach) and from a social perspective (the complexity theory framework). Four main typologies of the SW market system, exhibiting different kinds of innovation, are outlined: (i) a “traditional” landfill-oriented system; (ii) a modern “waste-to-energy” incinerator-oriented system; (iii) a “light recycling” system with integrated solutions and a selection performance that is lower than 50%; and (iv) a “hard recycling” system.
Innovation in the Solid Waste Management industry: integrating Neoclassical and Complexity Theory perspectives / Libero Gaeta, Giuseppe; Ghinoi, Stefano; Silvestri, Francesco; Tassinari, Mattia. - In: WASTE MANAGEMENT. - ISSN 0956-053X. - 120:(2021), pp. 50-58. [10.1016/j.wasman.2020.11.009]
Innovation in the Solid Waste Management industry: integrating Neoclassical and Complexity Theory perspectives
Stefano Ghinoi;Francesco Silvestri;Mattia Tassinari
2021
Abstract
Often considered a traditional labour intensive activity, in recent years, the solid waste management (SWM) industry has been largely interested in innovation. Nonetheless, the analysis of innovations in the SW industry is frequently confined to process innovation in the disposal segment, neglecting other kinds of innovation – such as product innovation and organizational innovation – in other segments. While several economic theoretical frameworks have been developed for interpreting eco-innovation in general, a specific analysis of innovation in each segment of SWM is still missing, despite the specificities of this sector. To fill this gap, this paper shows how complexity theory can be profitably used to integrate the more traditional neoclassical approach, offering a comprehensive theoretical framework to analyse innovation in the SWM industry from both a market and firm perspective (the neoclassical approach) and from a social perspective (the complexity theory framework). Four main typologies of the SW market system, exhibiting different kinds of innovation, are outlined: (i) a “traditional” landfill-oriented system; (ii) a modern “waste-to-energy” incinerator-oriented system; (iii) a “light recycling” system with integrated solutions and a selection performance that is lower than 50%; and (iv) a “hard recycling” system.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2. WM, 2021.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
492.08 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
492.08 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
30410 GHINOI_Innovation_In_The_Solid_Waste_Management_Industry_(AAM)_2020.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione
517.57 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
517.57 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris