Objective: To study the overall content and organizational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs from a global perspective to get an initial appraisal on the degree of heterogeneity worldwide. Methods: A twelve-question survey on content and organizational aspects was completed by representatives of pulmonary rehabilitation programs that previously participated in the European Respiratory Society (ERS) COPD Audit. Moreover, all ERS members affiliated with the ERS Scientific Groups 01.02 (Rehabilitation and Chronic Care) and/or 09.02 (Physiotherapy), all members of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR), and all ATS Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly members were asked to complete the survey via multiple e-mailings. Results: The survey has been completed by representatives of 430 centres from 40 countries. The findings demonstrate large differences among pulmonary rehabilitation programs across continents for all aspects that were surveyed, including the setting, the case-mix of individuals with a chronic respiratory disease, composition of the pulmonary rehabilitation team, completion rates, methods of referral, and types of reimbursement. Conclusions: The current findings stress the importance of future development of process and performance metrics to monitor pulmonary rehabilitation programs, to be able to start international benchmarking, and to provide recommendations for international standards based on evidence and best practice.

Differences in content and organizational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs / Ma, Spruit; F., Pitta; C., Garvey; Rl, Zuwallack; Cm, Roberts; Eg, Collins; R., Goldstein; R., Mcnamara; P., Surpas; K., Atsuyoshi; J., López Campos; I., Vogiatzis; Ja, Williams; S., Lareau; D., Brooks; T., Troosters; Sj, Singh; S., Hartl; Clini, Enrico; EFM W. o. u. t. e. r. s. On behalf of ERS Scientific Groups 0. 1., 02; 0. 9., 02; Aacvpr, ; ATS Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Assembly; ERS COPD Audit, Team. - In: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL. - ISSN 0903-1936. - ELETTRONICO. - 43:(2014), pp. 1326-1337. [10.1183/09031936.00145613]

Differences in content and organizational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

CLINI, Enrico;
2014

Abstract

Objective: To study the overall content and organizational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs from a global perspective to get an initial appraisal on the degree of heterogeneity worldwide. Methods: A twelve-question survey on content and organizational aspects was completed by representatives of pulmonary rehabilitation programs that previously participated in the European Respiratory Society (ERS) COPD Audit. Moreover, all ERS members affiliated with the ERS Scientific Groups 01.02 (Rehabilitation and Chronic Care) and/or 09.02 (Physiotherapy), all members of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation (AACVPR), and all ATS Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly members were asked to complete the survey via multiple e-mailings. Results: The survey has been completed by representatives of 430 centres from 40 countries. The findings demonstrate large differences among pulmonary rehabilitation programs across continents for all aspects that were surveyed, including the setting, the case-mix of individuals with a chronic respiratory disease, composition of the pulmonary rehabilitation team, completion rates, methods of referral, and types of reimbursement. Conclusions: The current findings stress the importance of future development of process and performance metrics to monitor pulmonary rehabilitation programs, to be able to start international benchmarking, and to provide recommendations for international standards based on evidence and best practice.
2014
43
1326
1337
Differences in content and organizational aspects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs / Ma, Spruit; F., Pitta; C., Garvey; Rl, Zuwallack; Cm, Roberts; Eg, Collins; R., Goldstein; R., Mcnamara; P., Surpas; K., Atsuyoshi; J., López Campos; I., Vogiatzis; Ja, Williams; S., Lareau; D., Brooks; T., Troosters; Sj, Singh; S., Hartl; Clini, Enrico; EFM W. o. u. t. e. r. s. On behalf of ERS Scientific Groups 0. 1., 02; 0. 9., 02; Aacvpr, ; ATS Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Assembly; ERS COPD Audit, Team. - In: EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL. - ISSN 0903-1936. - ELETTRONICO. - 43:(2014), pp. 1326-1337. [10.1183/09031936.00145613]
Ma, Spruit; F., Pitta; C., Garvey; Rl, Zuwallack; Cm, Roberts; Eg, Collins; R., Goldstein; R., Mcnamara; P., Surpas; K., Atsuyoshi; J., López Campos; I., Vogiatzis; Ja, Williams; S., Lareau; D., Brooks; T., Troosters; Sj, Singh; S., Hartl; Clini, Enrico; EFM W. o. u. t. e. r. s. On behalf of ERS Scientific Groups 0. 1., 02; 0. 9., 02; Aacvpr, ; ATS Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Assembly; ERS COPD Audit, Team
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Spruit (Differences in PR programs and contents- 2014).pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 742.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
742.14 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/984508
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 75
  • Scopus 218
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 184
social impact