We live in a world where demand for monitoring natural phenomena is growing. Sensor Networks are becoming ubiquitous in our society due to their broad applicability to data intensive tasks such as keeping air population to safe levels, efficient communication in military applications, implementation of alarms for forest fires, to mention but a few. Furthermore, we have seen the emergence of sensor technology being integrated in everyday objects such as cars, traffic lights, bicycles, phones, and even being attached to living beings such dolphins, trees, birds and humans. The consequence of this widespread use of sensors is that new sensor network infrastructures may be built out of static and mobile nodes. When mobility is a variable one should define which mobility model is best for the infrastructure given their differences; for instance human mobility is not akin to bird mobility. This paper then tries to evaluate which mobility pattern (or model) is best suited to be used in a Social Network of Sensors (SNoS). We evaluate several mobility models and measure the efficiency of information flow in a SNoS if mobile sensors follow these mobility patterns. The paper provide us with a greater understanding of the benefits of mobility in realistic scenarios.

Evaluating the Performance of Social Networks of Sensors Under Different Mobility Models / Tomasini, Marcello; Zambonelli, Franco; A., Brayner; R., Menezes. - ELETTRONICO. - (2013), pp. 397-402. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2013 ASE/IEEE Conference on Social Computing tenutosi a Washington DC nel Settembre 2013) [10.1109/SocialCom.2013.62].

Evaluating the Performance of Social Networks of Sensors Under Different Mobility Models

TOMASINI, MARCELLO;ZAMBONELLI, Franco;
2013

Abstract

We live in a world where demand for monitoring natural phenomena is growing. Sensor Networks are becoming ubiquitous in our society due to their broad applicability to data intensive tasks such as keeping air population to safe levels, efficient communication in military applications, implementation of alarms for forest fires, to mention but a few. Furthermore, we have seen the emergence of sensor technology being integrated in everyday objects such as cars, traffic lights, bicycles, phones, and even being attached to living beings such dolphins, trees, birds and humans. The consequence of this widespread use of sensors is that new sensor network infrastructures may be built out of static and mobile nodes. When mobility is a variable one should define which mobility model is best for the infrastructure given their differences; for instance human mobility is not akin to bird mobility. This paper then tries to evaluate which mobility pattern (or model) is best suited to be used in a Social Network of Sensors (SNoS). We evaluate several mobility models and measure the efficiency of information flow in a SNoS if mobile sensors follow these mobility patterns. The paper provide us with a greater understanding of the benefits of mobility in realistic scenarios.
2013
2013 ASE/IEEE Conference on Social Computing
Washington DC
Settembre 2013
397
402
Tomasini, Marcello; Zambonelli, Franco; A., Brayner; R., Menezes
Evaluating the Performance of Social Networks of Sensors Under Different Mobility Models / Tomasini, Marcello; Zambonelli, Franco; A., Brayner; R., Menezes. - ELETTRONICO. - (2013), pp. 397-402. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2013 ASE/IEEE Conference on Social Computing tenutosi a Washington DC nel Settembre 2013) [10.1109/SocialCom.2013.62].
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/979767
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact