OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to give a reality-based picture of the use of laparoscopic surgery for staging endometrial cancer patients out of the experimental setting. METHODS: Consecutive data of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal surgical staging in 6 Italian centers were recorded. Baseline patients and tumors characteristics, surgery performed, and safety data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1012 subjects (403 and 609 treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively) who received surgical stadiation for endometrial cancer were included in the final analysis. The laparoscopic approach to endometrial cancer was more commonly performed in younger and nonobese patients who had received less previous surgeries, whereas the abdominal approach was preferred for the advanced stages and rare histotypes. Irrespectively to stage, the operative time was higher for the laparoscopy than laparotomy, whereas blood loss and postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group. No difference between surgical approaches was observed in complication rates in stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they were worst in higher stages. The site, but not the incidence, of recurrences differed only for advanced stage endometrial cancers. No differences in overall, disease-free, and cancer-related survival rates were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: In the clinical practice, heterogeneous criteria are adopted to recur to laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer. The safety and the feasibility of the laparoscopy are confirmed for stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they appear suboptimal for the advanced stages.

Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer: a 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis / Palomba, S; Ghezzi, F; Falbo, A; Mandato, Vd; Annunziata, G; Lucia, E; Cromi, A; Abrate, M; LA SALA, Giovanni Battista; Giorda, G; Zullo, F; Franchi, M.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER. - ISSN 1048-891X. - ELETTRONICO. - 22:(2012), pp. 425-433. [10.1097/IGC.0b013e318244248c]

Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer: a 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis.

LA SALA, Giovanni Battista;
2012

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to give a reality-based picture of the use of laparoscopic surgery for staging endometrial cancer patients out of the experimental setting. METHODS: Consecutive data of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent laparoscopic or abdominal surgical staging in 6 Italian centers were recorded. Baseline patients and tumors characteristics, surgery performed, and safety data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1012 subjects (403 and 609 treated by laparoscopy and laparotomy, respectively) who received surgical stadiation for endometrial cancer were included in the final analysis. The laparoscopic approach to endometrial cancer was more commonly performed in younger and nonobese patients who had received less previous surgeries, whereas the abdominal approach was preferred for the advanced stages and rare histotypes. Irrespectively to stage, the operative time was higher for the laparoscopy than laparotomy, whereas blood loss and postoperative complications were lower in the laparoscopy group than in the laparotomy group. No difference between surgical approaches was observed in complication rates in stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they were worst in higher stages. The site, but not the incidence, of recurrences differed only for advanced stage endometrial cancers. No differences in overall, disease-free, and cancer-related survival rates were also observed. CONCLUSIONS: In the clinical practice, heterogeneous criteria are adopted to recur to laparoscopy for staging endometrial cancer. The safety and the feasibility of the laparoscopy are confirmed for stage I endometrial cancers, whereas they appear suboptimal for the advanced stages.
22
425
433
Laparoscopic versus abdominal approach to endometrial cancer: a 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis / Palomba, S; Ghezzi, F; Falbo, A; Mandato, Vd; Annunziata, G; Lucia, E; Cromi, A; Abrate, M; LA SALA, Giovanni Battista; Giorda, G; Zullo, F; Franchi, M.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER. - ISSN 1048-891X. - ELETTRONICO. - 22:(2012), pp. 425-433. [10.1097/IGC.0b013e318244248c]
Palomba, S; Ghezzi, F; Falbo, A; Mandato, Vd; Annunziata, G; Lucia, E; Cromi, A; Abrate, M; LA SALA, Giovanni Battista; Giorda, G; Zullo, F; Franchi, M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Palomba S 2012 Int J Gynecol Cancer.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Versione dell'editore (versione pubblicata)
Dimensione 1.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.06 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/859726
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 20
social impact