Index tracking aims at replicating a given benchmark with a smaller number of its constituents. Different quantitative models can be set up to determine the optimal index replicating port- folio. In this paper, we propose an alternative based on imposing a constraint on the q-norm (0 < q < 1) of the replicating portfolios’ asset weights: the q-norm constraint regularises the problem and identifies a sparse model. Both approaches are challenging from an optimisation viewpoint due to either the presence of the cardinality constraint or a non-convex constraint on the q-norm. The problem can become even more complex when non-convex distance mea- sures or other real-world constraints are considered. We employ a hybrid heuristic as a flexible tool to tackle both optimisation problems. The empirical analysis on real-world financial data allows to compare the two index tracking approaches. Moreover, we propose a strategy to determine the optimal number of constituents and the corresponding optimal portfolio asset weights.

Cardinality versus q-Norm Constraints for Index Tracking, / B., Fastrich; Paterlini, Sandra; P., Winker. - In: QUANTITATIVE FINANCE. - ISSN 1469-7696. - ELETTRONICO. - 14:11(2014), pp. 2019-2032. [10.1080/14697688.2012.691986]

Cardinality versus q-Norm Constraints for Index Tracking,

PATERLINI, Sandra;
2014

Abstract

Index tracking aims at replicating a given benchmark with a smaller number of its constituents. Different quantitative models can be set up to determine the optimal index replicating port- folio. In this paper, we propose an alternative based on imposing a constraint on the q-norm (0 < q < 1) of the replicating portfolios’ asset weights: the q-norm constraint regularises the problem and identifies a sparse model. Both approaches are challenging from an optimisation viewpoint due to either the presence of the cardinality constraint or a non-convex constraint on the q-norm. The problem can become even more complex when non-convex distance mea- sures or other real-world constraints are considered. We employ a hybrid heuristic as a flexible tool to tackle both optimisation problems. The empirical analysis on real-world financial data allows to compare the two index tracking approaches. Moreover, we propose a strategy to determine the optimal number of constituents and the corresponding optimal portfolio asset weights.
2014
3-ago-2012
14
11
2019
2032
Cardinality versus q-Norm Constraints for Index Tracking, / B., Fastrich; Paterlini, Sandra; P., Winker. - In: QUANTITATIVE FINANCE. - ISSN 1469-7696. - ELETTRONICO. - 14:11(2014), pp. 2019-2032. [10.1080/14697688.2012.691986]
B., Fastrich; Paterlini, Sandra; P., Winker
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/744308
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact