In this report we evaluated the indications, the results and limits of MR examination in the diagnosis of neoplastic diseases affecting the ovary and in the staging of endometrial or cervical cancerous processes. MR findings are compared with the results of other techniques like Ultrasonography or Computed Tomography. The best advantages of MR imaging are the lack of radiation and the possibility of multiplanar studies of the pathologies. For these reasons we consider MR imaging a more accurate method for the study of neoplastic disease affecting the gynecologic sphere.
[Correlations between magnetic resonance, ultrasonography, and computerized tomography in invasive gynecologic pathology] / G. F., Gualdi; Volpe, Annibale; E., Polettini; A., D'Agostino; A. M., Ceroni; E., Casciani. - In: LA CLINICA TERAPEUTICA. - ISSN 0009-9074. - STAMPA. - 144:(1994), pp. 139-146.
[Correlations between magnetic resonance, ultrasonography, and computerized tomography in invasive gynecologic pathology].
VOLPE, Annibale;
1994
Abstract
In this report we evaluated the indications, the results and limits of MR examination in the diagnosis of neoplastic diseases affecting the ovary and in the staging of endometrial or cervical cancerous processes. MR findings are compared with the results of other techniques like Ultrasonography or Computed Tomography. The best advantages of MR imaging are the lack of radiation and the possibility of multiplanar studies of the pathologies. For these reasons we consider MR imaging a more accurate method for the study of neoplastic disease affecting the gynecologic sphere.
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris
