The aim of the study was to compare high-versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin as primary chemotherapy for suboptimal stage III and IV ovarian cancer.One hundred forty-five patients were randomized to receive six courses of cisplatin 50 or 100 mg/m2 plus epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The two treatment arms were well balanced; all patients had greater than 2 cm and 37.2\% had greater than 5 cm of residual disease; 29.6\% had stage IV disease.Patients in the high-dose arm received a double dose-intensity and double total dose of cisplatin. The high-dose regimen induced significantly more episodes of leukopenia (47.8\% v 32.8\%, P = .05), thrombocytopenia (21.7\% v 3.2\%, P = .003), anemia (37.6\% v 12.5\%, P = .002), nephrotoxicity (six v one patient), and neurotoxicity (30.4\% v 6.3\%, P = .002). There were no significant differences in efficacy in terms of clinical response rate (high-dose 57.5\% v low-dose 61.1\%), pathologic complete response (CR) (9.6\% v 18.1\%), median survival times (29 v 24 months), and median progression-free survival (18 v 13 months).This study shows that doubling the dose-intensity and total dose of cisplatin in combination with epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide has significant toxic effects and does not improve clinical outcome in patients with suboptimal ovarian cancer.
High-dose versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin in suboptimal ovarian cancer: a randomized study of the Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest / Conte, P., M., B., F., C., A., G., R., A., A., B., F., B., I., B., E., C., S., C., G., F., L., G., L., I., S., M., G., P., N., R., R., R., S., R., A., R.. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0732-183X. - STAMPA. - 14:(1996), pp. 351-356. [10.1200/JCO.1996.14.2.349]
High-dose versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin in suboptimal ovarian cancer: a randomized study of the Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest.
CONTE, Pierfranco;
1996
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare high-versus low-dose cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide and epidoxorubicin as primary chemotherapy for suboptimal stage III and IV ovarian cancer.One hundred forty-five patients were randomized to receive six courses of cisplatin 50 or 100 mg/m2 plus epidoxorubicin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The two treatment arms were well balanced; all patients had greater than 2 cm and 37.2\% had greater than 5 cm of residual disease; 29.6\% had stage IV disease.Patients in the high-dose arm received a double dose-intensity and double total dose of cisplatin. The high-dose regimen induced significantly more episodes of leukopenia (47.8\% v 32.8\%, P = .05), thrombocytopenia (21.7\% v 3.2\%, P = .003), anemia (37.6\% v 12.5\%, P = .002), nephrotoxicity (six v one patient), and neurotoxicity (30.4\% v 6.3\%, P = .002). There were no significant differences in efficacy in terms of clinical response rate (high-dose 57.5\% v low-dose 61.1\%), pathologic complete response (CR) (9.6\% v 18.1\%), median survival times (29 v 24 months), and median progression-free survival (18 v 13 months).This study shows that doubling the dose-intensity and total dose of cisplatin in combination with epidoxorubicin and cyclophosphamide has significant toxic effects and does not improve clinical outcome in patients with suboptimal ovarian cancer.Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




