The Archaean greenstone belt of Hidrolina (Centrai Goiás, Brazil) is a severely tectonized and metamorphosed volcano-sedimentary sequence. It consists of a lower sequence (LS) with ultramafic and mafic flows (compositionally corresponding to komatiites) and an upper scquence (US) with intercalated mafic and felsic flows (compositionally corresponding to tholeiites, dacites, and rhyolites). Practically no primary structure or texture is preserved. Geochemical major and trace element modelling allows distinction between liquid compositions and cumulates. Crustal contamination does not seem to have been effective in controlling the geochemical variations. Batch partial melting models and CMAS plot indicate that: (a) the komatiites probably resulted from moderate (28-30%) melting of a spinel peridotite rather than a garnet one; (b) the komatiites were formed by the mixing of a liquid of basaltic composition with peridotite source material; (c) the mantle source was heterogeneous, the flows higher in the stratigraphy coming from a more depleted source than the lower ones; and (d) US tholeiites resulted from lower degree melting of the same depleted source that produced the upper LS flows.
Geochemical Models for the Petrogenesis of Komatiites from the Hidrolina Greenstone Belt, CentraI Goias, Brazil / Rivalenti, Giorgio; Girardi, V. A. V.; Coltorti, M.; Correia, C. T.; Mazzucchelli, Maurizio. - In: JOURNAL OF PETROLOGY. - ISSN 0022-3530. - STAMPA. - 30:(1989), pp. 175-197. [10.1093/petrology/30.1.175]
Geochemical Models for the Petrogenesis of Komatiites from the Hidrolina Greenstone Belt, CentraI Goias, Brazil
RIVALENTI, Giorgio;MAZZUCCHELLI, Maurizio
1989
Abstract
The Archaean greenstone belt of Hidrolina (Centrai Goiás, Brazil) is a severely tectonized and metamorphosed volcano-sedimentary sequence. It consists of a lower sequence (LS) with ultramafic and mafic flows (compositionally corresponding to komatiites) and an upper scquence (US) with intercalated mafic and felsic flows (compositionally corresponding to tholeiites, dacites, and rhyolites). Practically no primary structure or texture is preserved. Geochemical major and trace element modelling allows distinction between liquid compositions and cumulates. Crustal contamination does not seem to have been effective in controlling the geochemical variations. Batch partial melting models and CMAS plot indicate that: (a) the komatiites probably resulted from moderate (28-30%) melting of a spinel peridotite rather than a garnet one; (b) the komatiites were formed by the mixing of a liquid of basaltic composition with peridotite source material; (c) the mantle source was heterogeneous, the flows higher in the stratigraphy coming from a more depleted source than the lower ones; and (d) US tholeiites resulted from lower degree melting of the same depleted source that produced the upper LS flows.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
1989RivalentiEtAl_reduced_OCR.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione dell'autore revisionata e accettata per la pubblicazione
Dimensione
2.2 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.2 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris