PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic stone extraction was attempted in 11 men and 6 women 22 to 75 years old, including 6 with ureteral and 11 with renal calculi. Of the renal stones 9 were associated with a concomitant pathological condition requiring surgery. Four patients had multiple stones (2 to 93) and stone size ranged from 2 to 60 mm. (mean 15.6). RESULTS: Stones from 15 of 17 patients were removed successfully via laparoscopic techniques. Operative time ranged from 2.33 to 6.35 hours (mean 4.9). Prolonged operating times were associated with ancillary or failed procedures. Blood loss ranged from 20 to 350 ml. (mean 132.9), narcotic requirement from 0 to 100 mg. morphine (mean 26) and hospital stay from 1 to 15 days (mean 4.5). The 3 postoperative complications included prolonged ileus (2) and a retroperitoneal urinoma requiring secondary drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic stone removal is safe and feasible. Indications for this approach include urinary stones associated with an anatomical abnormality requiring urinary tract reconstruction and calculi for which other minimally invasive therapies failed.

The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi / Micali, Salvatore; R. G., Moore; T. D., Averch; J. B., Adams; L. R., Kavoussi. - In: THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0022-5347. - ELETTRONICO. - 157(2):(1997), pp. 463-466.

The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi

MICALI, Salvatore;
1997

Abstract

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral stones. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic stone extraction was attempted in 11 men and 6 women 22 to 75 years old, including 6 with ureteral and 11 with renal calculi. Of the renal stones 9 were associated with a concomitant pathological condition requiring surgery. Four patients had multiple stones (2 to 93) and stone size ranged from 2 to 60 mm. (mean 15.6). RESULTS: Stones from 15 of 17 patients were removed successfully via laparoscopic techniques. Operative time ranged from 2.33 to 6.35 hours (mean 4.9). Prolonged operating times were associated with ancillary or failed procedures. Blood loss ranged from 20 to 350 ml. (mean 132.9), narcotic requirement from 0 to 100 mg. morphine (mean 26) and hospital stay from 1 to 15 days (mean 4.5). The 3 postoperative complications included prolonged ileus (2) and a retroperitoneal urinoma requiring secondary drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic stone removal is safe and feasible. Indications for this approach include urinary stones associated with an anatomical abnormality requiring urinary tract reconstruction and calculi for which other minimally invasive therapies failed.
1997
157(2)
463
466
The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi / Micali, Salvatore; R. G., Moore; T. D., Averch; J. B., Adams; L. R., Kavoussi. - In: THE JOURNAL OF UROLOGY. - ISSN 0022-5347. - ELETTRONICO. - 157(2):(1997), pp. 463-466.
Micali, Salvatore; R. G., Moore; T. D., Averch; J. B., Adams; L. R., Kavoussi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
7 - The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi.pdf

Solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 417.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
417.16 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/710233
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 11
  • Scopus 83
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 68
social impact