PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation strategies of measurement instruments and their validity as adopted in Italian hospital nursing practice.METHOD. A descriptive, regionally based study was adopted in 2008. Eight public hospitals were included. After collecting the available instruments used by nurses and/or patients in the measurement of patients' problems or perceptions of those problems (actual and/or potential), the researchers conducted two structured interviews per ward: the first with the chief nurse, the second with a clinical nurse. The interviews focused on each measurement instrument collected, on the implementation strategies adopted for the instruments, and on the perceived usefulness and appropriateness of each instrument.FINDINGS. Overall, 70 wards were included; 18 (25.7%) of the wards did not use any instrument. In the remaining 52 wards, 156 instruments were collected (from 1 to 10 per ward) evaluating 55 different actual or potential patient problems. Of the instruments adopted, 70.9% were not formally validated. Hospital administration primarily determined which instruments were to be used (67, 42.9%), and introduction to staff was mainly supported by continuing education courses (92, 59%). The level of appropriateness and usefulness of the instruments, as perceived by the clinical nurses and chief nurses, was high (>8 on a scale of 0–10, where 0 = not at all appropriate/useful and 10 = very appropriate/useful).CONCLUSION. Despite the increasing demands for reliable nursing data as a basis for measuring nursing effects on nursing outcomes and safety, a number of wards used no measurement instruments at all; within wards that used measurement tools, many instruments had not been validated.IMPLICATIONS. The introduction of nonvalidated instruments in Italian hospitals needs to be restricted because of the short- and long-term negative effects these nonvalidated instruments may have. A national consensus on approved and validated instruments for nursing assessment should be made available in the wards as a priority

Implementation strategies of measurement instruments, and their validity as adopted in Italian Nursing Hospital Practice: an Italian cross sectional study / A., Palese; S., Colognese; C., Pellicciari; Mecugni, Daniela. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE. - ISSN 2047-3095. - ELETTRONICO. - 23:(2012), pp. 75-85. [10.1111/j.2047-3095.2011.01202.x]

Implementation strategies of measurement instruments, and their validity as adopted in Italian Nursing Hospital Practice: an Italian cross sectional study.

MECUGNI, Daniela
2012

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to describe the implementation strategies of measurement instruments and their validity as adopted in Italian hospital nursing practice.METHOD. A descriptive, regionally based study was adopted in 2008. Eight public hospitals were included. After collecting the available instruments used by nurses and/or patients in the measurement of patients' problems or perceptions of those problems (actual and/or potential), the researchers conducted two structured interviews per ward: the first with the chief nurse, the second with a clinical nurse. The interviews focused on each measurement instrument collected, on the implementation strategies adopted for the instruments, and on the perceived usefulness and appropriateness of each instrument.FINDINGS. Overall, 70 wards were included; 18 (25.7%) of the wards did not use any instrument. In the remaining 52 wards, 156 instruments were collected (from 1 to 10 per ward) evaluating 55 different actual or potential patient problems. Of the instruments adopted, 70.9% were not formally validated. Hospital administration primarily determined which instruments were to be used (67, 42.9%), and introduction to staff was mainly supported by continuing education courses (92, 59%). The level of appropriateness and usefulness of the instruments, as perceived by the clinical nurses and chief nurses, was high (>8 on a scale of 0–10, where 0 = not at all appropriate/useful and 10 = very appropriate/useful).CONCLUSION. Despite the increasing demands for reliable nursing data as a basis for measuring nursing effects on nursing outcomes and safety, a number of wards used no measurement instruments at all; within wards that used measurement tools, many instruments had not been validated.IMPLICATIONS. The introduction of nonvalidated instruments in Italian hospitals needs to be restricted because of the short- and long-term negative effects these nonvalidated instruments may have. A national consensus on approved and validated instruments for nursing assessment should be made available in the wards as a priority
2012
23
75
85
Implementation strategies of measurement instruments, and their validity as adopted in Italian Nursing Hospital Practice: an Italian cross sectional study / A., Palese; S., Colognese; C., Pellicciari; Mecugni, Daniela. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING KNOWLEDGE. - ISSN 2047-3095. - ELETTRONICO. - 23:(2012), pp. 75-85. [10.1111/j.2047-3095.2011.01202.x]
A., Palese; S., Colognese; C., Pellicciari; Mecugni, Daniela
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
International_journal_2012.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 158.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
158.46 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/708874
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact