This paper deals with the compensation of magneticsaturation in line frequency transformer coupled, grid-connectedpower converters. The developed strategy originates from thechoice of controlling the actual current injected in the grid (outputof the line frequency transformer) instead of the input current ofthe transformer, as usually proposed. As a matter of fact, betterpower quality cannot neglect the direct control of the injected gridcurrent. An effective solution providing zero steady-state error atgrid frequency and superior disturbance rejection involves the useof a d–q current controller synchronous with the grid voltage. Forthis reason, the proposed saturation compensation strategy hasbeen implemented inside the d–q reference frame. The downsideis that closing the current feedback at the transformer output rendersimpossible to control the dc current at transformer input,leading to core saturation. A core saturation compensation strategy,based only on the monitoring of the output current distortionaround voltage zero crossings, is here presented. Moreover, sincethe proposed solution does not rely on dc measures, offset problemsare avoided. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of theproposed control architecture and of the strategy adopted to avoidtransformer core saturation.
Saturation Compensation Strategy for Grid Connected Converters Based on Line Frequency Transformers / Franceschini, G.; Lorenzani, Emilio; Buticchi, G.. - In: IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION. - ISSN 0885-8969. - STAMPA. - 27:2(2012), pp. 229-237. [10.1109/TEC.2012.2184113]
Saturation Compensation Strategy for Grid Connected Converters Based on Line Frequency Transformers
Franceschini G.;LORENZANI, EMILIO;
2012
Abstract
This paper deals with the compensation of magneticsaturation in line frequency transformer coupled, grid-connectedpower converters. The developed strategy originates from thechoice of controlling the actual current injected in the grid (outputof the line frequency transformer) instead of the input current ofthe transformer, as usually proposed. As a matter of fact, betterpower quality cannot neglect the direct control of the injected gridcurrent. An effective solution providing zero steady-state error atgrid frequency and superior disturbance rejection involves the useof a d–q current controller synchronous with the grid voltage. Forthis reason, the proposed saturation compensation strategy hasbeen implemented inside the d–q reference frame. The downsideis that closing the current feedback at the transformer output rendersimpossible to control the dc current at transformer input,leading to core saturation. A core saturation compensation strategy,based only on the monitoring of the output current distortionaround voltage zero crossings, is here presented. Moreover, sincethe proposed solution does not rely on dc measures, offset problemsare avoided. Experimental results confirm the effectiveness of theproposed control architecture and of the strategy adopted to avoidtransformer core saturation.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Saturation Compensation.pdf
Accesso riservato
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
1.07 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.07 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris