This paper integrates the tools of corpus linguistics and a more genre-oriented perspective in order to explore the lemmatizations of conclu* in the Conclusions of English and Italian research articles in history. Specifically, the main emphasis is placed on second-level Summarizers and concluders (Siepmann 2005) and the way they interact with other discourse markers and metadiscourse across moves. As will be seen, SLDMs represent a marked option,in that they add extra-meaning to their more general, more transparent, more frequent, and lessspecific counterparts. Whereas variation within the unit or pattern results from combinations with discourse markers from the same or other categories, variation across English and Italian isbetter accounted for within an interpersonal model of metadiscourse (Hyland 2004, 2008), interms of different strategies on the interactional level.
Conclu* in English and Italian historical research articles / Cacchiani, Silvia. - ELETTRONICO. - (2011), pp. 1-32. (Intervento presentato al convegno International Symposium on Using Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies. 2010 Conference (UCCTS2010) tenutosi a Edge Hill University, Ormskirk UK nel 27-29 July 2010).
Conclu* in English and Italian historical research articles
CACCHIANI, Silvia
2011
Abstract
This paper integrates the tools of corpus linguistics and a more genre-oriented perspective in order to explore the lemmatizations of conclu* in the Conclusions of English and Italian research articles in history. Specifically, the main emphasis is placed on second-level Summarizers and concluders (Siepmann 2005) and the way they interact with other discourse markers and metadiscourse across moves. As will be seen, SLDMs represent a marked option,in that they add extra-meaning to their more general, more transparent, more frequent, and lessspecific counterparts. Whereas variation within the unit or pattern results from combinations with discourse markers from the same or other categories, variation across English and Italian isbetter accounted for within an interpersonal model of metadiscourse (Hyland 2004, 2008), interms of different strategies on the interactional level.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
UCTTS_2010_Cacchiani.pdf
Open access
Descrizione: paper in proceedings
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
135.33 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
135.33 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris