The Austrian-German-Italian (AGI) Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry includes now data of 520 patients grafted for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by autologous and allogeneic stem cells. In first complete remission (CR1) 145 patients with allografts had a possibility of event free survival (pEFS) of 0.57 and 140 patients with autografts a pEFS of 0.46. In second complete remission (CR2) autografted patients (n = 70) had a pEFS of 0.36 and allogeneic patients (n = 41) of 0.34. Patients with no CR went worse (allogeneic pEFS 0.15 n = 37; autologous pEFS 0.17 n = 6). Therefore, from the European data the following conclusions can be drawn: neither in CR1 nor in CR2 any statistical advantage for a particular transplantation type can be found. To assess the value of transplantation with family mismatch donors or matched unrelated donors (MUD) basing on these data pool is not possible. The following decisions should be reached: 1) BMT for AML with mismatched or unrelated donors should be done only within cooperative European trials. 2) Generally accepted definitions of indications for BMT in AML are needed. 3) Study protocols concerning conditioning are necessary.

Autologous versus allogeneic BMT in AML: the European experience. Report of the EBMT--Pediatric Diseases Working Party / Klingebiel, T; Pession, A; Paolucci, Paolo; Rondelli, R.. - In: BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 0268-3369. - STAMPA. - 18 suppl 2:(1996), pp. 49-52.

Autologous versus allogeneic BMT in AML: the European experience. Report of the EBMT--Pediatric Diseases Working Party.

PAOLUCCI, Paolo;
1996

Abstract

The Austrian-German-Italian (AGI) Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplantation Registry includes now data of 520 patients grafted for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by autologous and allogeneic stem cells. In first complete remission (CR1) 145 patients with allografts had a possibility of event free survival (pEFS) of 0.57 and 140 patients with autografts a pEFS of 0.46. In second complete remission (CR2) autografted patients (n = 70) had a pEFS of 0.36 and allogeneic patients (n = 41) of 0.34. Patients with no CR went worse (allogeneic pEFS 0.15 n = 37; autologous pEFS 0.17 n = 6). Therefore, from the European data the following conclusions can be drawn: neither in CR1 nor in CR2 any statistical advantage for a particular transplantation type can be found. To assess the value of transplantation with family mismatch donors or matched unrelated donors (MUD) basing on these data pool is not possible. The following decisions should be reached: 1) BMT for AML with mismatched or unrelated donors should be done only within cooperative European trials. 2) Generally accepted definitions of indications for BMT in AML are needed. 3) Study protocols concerning conditioning are necessary.
1996
18 suppl 2
49
52
Autologous versus allogeneic BMT in AML: the European experience. Report of the EBMT--Pediatric Diseases Working Party / Klingebiel, T; Pession, A; Paolucci, Paolo; Rondelli, R.. - In: BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION. - ISSN 0268-3369. - STAMPA. - 18 suppl 2:(1996), pp. 49-52.
Klingebiel, T; Pession, A; Paolucci, Paolo; Rondelli, R.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/647947
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact