We prove that defining consumers’ preferences over budget sets is both necessary and sufficient to make every fully informative and finite set of observed consumption choices rationalizable by a collection of preferences which are transitive, complete, and monotone with respect to own consumption. Our finding has two important theoretical consequences. First, assuming that preferences depend on budget sets is illegitimate under the scientific commitments of revealed preference theory. Second, as long as consumers’ preferences are not defined over budget sets, we can assume that preferences depend on observable objects other than own consumption without compromising the logical possibility to reject the model against observation. We however point out that, despite this logical possibility, in practice it can be almost impossible to reject a model where preferences are defined over objects that depend on budget sets. As an example of this we show that if preferences are defined over consumption choices of other individuals then rationalization fails only in cases of negligible practical interest.

On the Rationalizability of Observed Consumers’ Choices when Preferences Depend on Budget Sets and (Potentially) on Anything Else / Bilancini, Ennio. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0931-8658. - STAMPA. - 102:(2011), pp. 275-286. [10.1007/s00712-010-0186-4]

On the Rationalizability of Observed Consumers’ Choices when Preferences Depend on Budget Sets and (Potentially) on Anything Else

BILANCINI, Ennio
2011

Abstract

We prove that defining consumers’ preferences over budget sets is both necessary and sufficient to make every fully informative and finite set of observed consumption choices rationalizable by a collection of preferences which are transitive, complete, and monotone with respect to own consumption. Our finding has two important theoretical consequences. First, assuming that preferences depend on budget sets is illegitimate under the scientific commitments of revealed preference theory. Second, as long as consumers’ preferences are not defined over budget sets, we can assume that preferences depend on observable objects other than own consumption without compromising the logical possibility to reject the model against observation. We however point out that, despite this logical possibility, in practice it can be almost impossible to reject a model where preferences are defined over objects that depend on budget sets. As an example of this we show that if preferences are defined over consumption choices of other individuals then rationalization fails only in cases of negligible practical interest.
102
275
286
On the Rationalizability of Observed Consumers’ Choices when Preferences Depend on Budget Sets and (Potentially) on Anything Else / Bilancini, Ennio. - In: JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS. - ISSN 0931-8658. - STAMPA. - 102:(2011), pp. 275-286. [10.1007/s00712-010-0186-4]
Bilancini, Ennio
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
bi-joe.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Post-print dell'autore (bozza post referaggio)
Dimensione 180.83 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
180.83 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Caricamento pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11380/646928
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact