Petrol., chem., and polytype data are presented for dioctahedral potassic micas from K-feldspar-bearing metamorphic and igneous rocks of acidic compn. unaffected by high-pressure (HP) conditions. The paper aims to demonstrate that: (1) under non-HP conditions, in both metamorphic and igneous plutonic environments, a given bulk-rock compositional constraint imposes a more or less marked phengitic compn. to dioctahedral potassic mica; and (2) this muscovite crystallizes as 2M1, notwithstanding its phengitic compn. The samples (157 in no.) are from widespread provenances. We conclude that the growth of 3T polytype of muscovite is not a function of mica compn. This is consistent with the recent crystallog. knowledge on polytypism, cation ordering, elastic properties, and structural deformational mechanisms of muscovite, which address the stabilization of 3T with pressure.

What drives the distribution in nature of 3T vs. 2M1 polytype in muscovites and phengites? A general assessment based on new data from metamorphic and igneous granitoid rocks / Sassi, R.; Brigatti, Maria Franca; Gomez Pugnaire, M. T.; Peruzzo, L.; Tellini, F.; Sassi, F. P.. - In: AMERICAN MINERALOGIST. - ISSN 0003-004X. - STAMPA. - 95(8-9):(2010), pp. 1182-1191. [10.2138/am.2010.3362]

What drives the distribution in nature of 3T vs. 2M1 polytype in muscovites and phengites? A general assessment based on new data from metamorphic and igneous granitoid rocks

BRIGATTI, Maria Franca;
2010

Abstract

Petrol., chem., and polytype data are presented for dioctahedral potassic micas from K-feldspar-bearing metamorphic and igneous rocks of acidic compn. unaffected by high-pressure (HP) conditions. The paper aims to demonstrate that: (1) under non-HP conditions, in both metamorphic and igneous plutonic environments, a given bulk-rock compositional constraint imposes a more or less marked phengitic compn. to dioctahedral potassic mica; and (2) this muscovite crystallizes as 2M1, notwithstanding its phengitic compn. The samples (157 in no.) are from widespread provenances. We conclude that the growth of 3T polytype of muscovite is not a function of mica compn. This is consistent with the recent crystallog. knowledge on polytypism, cation ordering, elastic properties, and structural deformational mechanisms of muscovite, which address the stabilization of 3T with pressure.
2010
95(8-9)
1182
1191
What drives the distribution in nature of 3T vs. 2M1 polytype in muscovites and phengites? A general assessment based on new data from metamorphic and igneous granitoid rocks / Sassi, R.; Brigatti, Maria Franca; Gomez Pugnaire, M. T.; Peruzzo, L.; Tellini, F.; Sassi, F. P.. - In: AMERICAN MINERALOGIST. - ISSN 0003-004X. - STAMPA. - 95(8-9):(2010), pp. 1182-1191. [10.2138/am.2010.3362]
Sassi, R.; Brigatti, Maria Franca; Gomez Pugnaire, M. T.; Peruzzo, L.; Tellini, F.; Sassi, F. P.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
154_Sassi_p1182-1191_10.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: REPRINT
Tipologia: Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 1.72 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.72 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/646203
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact