The paper argues that the state of the art of Italian philosophy isn't as disparaging as Roberto Farneti has argued in a paper appeared in the same journal and that the policy of having peer-reviews is useful to oppose corrupt academic habits but can't really bestow originality on a paper if it lacks it.
Notes on Italian philosophy, peer-reviews and 'la corruttela' / Coliva, Annalisa. - In: PHILOSOPHIA. - ISSN 0048-3893. - STAMPA. - 38/1:(2010), pp. 29-39. [10.1007/s11406-009-9197-1]
Notes on Italian philosophy, peer-reviews and 'la corruttela'
COLIVA, Annalisa
2010
Abstract
The paper argues that the state of the art of Italian philosophy isn't as disparaging as Roberto Farneti has argued in a paper appeared in the same journal and that the policy of having peer-reviews is useful to oppose corrupt academic habits but can't really bestow originality on a paper if it lacks it.
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Coliva2010_Article_NotesOnItalianPhilosophyPeer-R.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
145.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
145.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris
