Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies

Shunemann H., J; Oxman A., D; Borzek, J; Glasziou, P; Jaeschke, R; Vist G., E; Williams J. W., Jr; Kunz, R; Craig, J; Montori V., M; Bossuyt, P; Guyatt G., H; Liberati, Alessandro; Grade Working Group,

A guideline’s formulation should include a clear question with specification of all outcomes of importance to patients GRADE offers four levels of evidence quality: high, moderate, low, and very low Randomised trials begin as high quality evidence and observational studies as low quality evidence Quality may be downgraded as a result of limitations in study design or implementation, imprecision of estimates (wide confidence intervals), variability in results, indirectness of evidence, or publication bias Quality may be upgraded because of a very large magnitude of effect, a dose-response gradient, . . . [Full text of this article]

Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies / Shunemann H., J; Oxman A., D; Borzek, J; Glasziou, P; Jaeschke, R; Vist G., E; Williams J. W., Jr; Kunz, R; Craig, J; Montori V., M; Bossuyt, P; Guyatt G., H; Liberati, Alessandro; Grade Working, Group. - In: BMJ. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. - ISSN 0959-8138. - STAMPA. - 336(2008), pp. 1106-1110.

Data di pubblicazione:	2008
Titolo:	Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies
Autore/i:	Shunemann H., J; Oxman A., D; Borzek, J; Glasziou, P; Jaeschke, R; Vist G., E; Williams J. W., Jr; Kunz, R; Craig, J; Montori V., M; Bossuyt, P; Guyatt G., H; Liberati, Alessandro; Grade Working, Group
Autore/i UNIMORE:	Shunemann H. J Oxman A. D Borzek J Glasziou P Jaeschke R Vist G. E Williams J. W. Jr Kunz R Craig J Montori V. M Bossuyt P Guyatt G. H LIBERATI, Alessandro Grade Working Group mostra contributor esterni nascondi contributor esterni
Rivista:	BMJ. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL
Volume:	336
Pagina iniziale:	1106
Pagina finale:	1110
Codice identificativo ISI:	WOS:000255975100037
Codice identificativo Scopus:	2-s2.0-44349190420
Codice identificativo Pubmed:	18483053
Citazione:	Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations for Diagnostic Tests and Strategies / Shunemann H., J; Oxman A., D; Borzek, J; Glasziou, P; Jaeschke, R; Vist G., E; Williams J. W., Jr; Kunz, R; Craig, J; Montori V., M; Bossuyt, P; Guyatt G., H; Liberati, Alessandro; Grade Working, Group. - In: BMJ. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL. - ISSN 0959-8138. - STAMPA. - 336(2008), pp. 1106-1110.
Tipologia	Articolo su rivista

File in questo prodotto:

Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento:
http://hdl.handle.net/11380/625049

Citazioni

I documenti presenti in Iris Unimore sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 3.0 Italia, salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris