Introduction: the antibacteric action of irri- gants in the endodontic therapy could be in- hibited by many factors. The most important one is the presence of bacterial strain (e.g. En- terococcus faecalis) resistant to irrigants and intracanal dressing action. Two new irrigants, based on antibiotics, Tetraclean and Bio Pure MTAD have been recently proposed to face this problem. The aim of this study is to com- pare the antibiotic action of these new irrig- ants. Methodology: according to NCCLS guide- lines the MIC of Tetraclean and MTAD against Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 strain were determined, using dilutions from 1:2 to 1:2048. Results: Bio Pure MTAD killed all bacteria until a dilution of 1:256; Tetraclean has shown better results, until 1:1024. Conclusions: both Bio Pure MTAD and Tetr- aclean proved effective antibacteric action as compared to the Enterococcus faecalis strain examined. Tetraclean was better than MTAD. Other in vitro and in vivo studies should be performed to confirm these data.
Effetto antimicrobico di due nuovi irriganti nei confronti dell'Enterococcus faecalis: studio comparativo in vitro / Giardino, L; Ambu, E; Generali, Luigi; Savoldi, E.. - In: GIORNALE ITALIANO DI ENDODONZIA. - ISSN 1121-4171. - STAMPA. - 2:(2006), pp. 91-94.
Effetto antimicrobico di due nuovi irriganti nei confronti dell'Enterococcus faecalis: studio comparativo in vitro
GENERALI, Luigi;
2006
Abstract
Introduction: the antibacteric action of irri- gants in the endodontic therapy could be in- hibited by many factors. The most important one is the presence of bacterial strain (e.g. En- terococcus faecalis) resistant to irrigants and intracanal dressing action. Two new irrigants, based on antibiotics, Tetraclean and Bio Pure MTAD have been recently proposed to face this problem. The aim of this study is to com- pare the antibiotic action of these new irrig- ants. Methodology: according to NCCLS guide- lines the MIC of Tetraclean and MTAD against Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 strain were determined, using dilutions from 1:2 to 1:2048. Results: Bio Pure MTAD killed all bacteria until a dilution of 1:256; Tetraclean has shown better results, until 1:1024. Conclusions: both Bio Pure MTAD and Tetr- aclean proved effective antibacteric action as compared to the Enterococcus faecalis strain examined. Tetraclean was better than MTAD. Other in vitro and in vivo studies should be performed to confirm these data.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
6-Effetto antimicrobico di due nuovi irriganti nei confronti dell'Enterococcus faecalis studio comparativo in vitro.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
433.02 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
433.02 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris