This article examines the private-law implementation of religious freedom in post-mortem wealth transmission and uses parasuccession as a test of intercultural legal translation beyond ‘Euclidean pluralism’. It argues that parasuccession is a functional, not causal, category: religiously qualified interests can become legally operative only when they are individually assumed, made intersubjectively recognizable and translated through ordinary civil-law institutions. The analysis distinguishes meaning from legal effect without reducing religion to an internal fact or treating it as an autonomous source of private law. A controlled sequence of recognition, qualification and review is applied to trusts, destination arrangements, donations, contracts for the benefit of third parties, post-mortem mandates and fiduciary transactions. The limits are then disaggregated according to their legal function: Article 458 of the Italian Civil Code delimits private autonomy with regard to future devolution; Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 coordinates divergent laws on agreements as to succession; Article 35 filters manifestly incompatible foreign-law effects. Iraqi law serves as a final laboratory showing how the same religiously inspired distributive project may enter the forum through different legal titles. Translation, on this account, neither imports religious rules nor erases them: it preserves their meaning while subjecting every civil effect to the proper legal form, limit and remedy.
Tradurre il dopo-morte. Fattore religioso, fenomeni parasuccessori e autonomia privata oltre il pluralismo euclideo / Hussen, B.. - In: CALUMET. - ISSN 2465-0145. - 26:(2026), pp. 169-210.
Tradurre il dopo-morte. Fattore religioso, fenomeni parasuccessori e autonomia privata oltre il pluralismo euclideo
Basira Hussen
2026
Abstract
This article examines the private-law implementation of religious freedom in post-mortem wealth transmission and uses parasuccession as a test of intercultural legal translation beyond ‘Euclidean pluralism’. It argues that parasuccession is a functional, not causal, category: religiously qualified interests can become legally operative only when they are individually assumed, made intersubjectively recognizable and translated through ordinary civil-law institutions. The analysis distinguishes meaning from legal effect without reducing religion to an internal fact or treating it as an autonomous source of private law. A controlled sequence of recognition, qualification and review is applied to trusts, destination arrangements, donations, contracts for the benefit of third parties, post-mortem mandates and fiduciary transactions. The limits are then disaggregated according to their legal function: Article 458 of the Italian Civil Code delimits private autonomy with regard to future devolution; Article 25 of Regulation (EU) No 650/2012 coordinates divergent laws on agreements as to succession; Article 35 filters manifestly incompatible foreign-law effects. Iraqi law serves as a final laboratory showing how the same religiously inspired distributive project may enter the forum through different legal titles. Translation, on this account, neither imports religious rules nor erases them: it preserves their meaning while subjecting every civil effect to the proper legal form, limit and remedy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Hussen-Tradurre.pdf
Open access
Descrizione: Articolo
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
1.21 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.21 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris





