The essay offers a reappraisal of State-religion relations through the lenses of innovation and serendipity. After defining innovation as the intentional and systemic transformation of the possible into the real, the Author draws on Christian Busch’s theory of serendipity – articulated through agency, surprise and value, and unfolding in the phases of enabling potentiality and materialization – as a technique for governing institutional uncertainty. This category is then connected with the constitutional principle of good administration (Art. 97 of the Italian Constitution), with the supreme principle of secularism (laicità), and with the principle of bilaterality (Art. 8), in order to outline a model of “serendipitous bilaterality” capable of turning religious pluralism into an opportunity for institutional learning. The argument is tested through the analysis of the ecological transition of places of worship, where the exemption from energy-certification duties has gradually evolved, through dialogue between public administrations and religious communities, into a laboratory of sustainable co-administration. Secularism thus emerges as a generative principle of normative cooperation, and sustainability as a shared semantics among law, technique and faith.
Laicità, bilateralità, serendipità. Dalla transizione ecologica all’innovazione dei paradigmi nei rapporti tra Stato e confessioni / Pacillo, V.. - In: DIRITTO E RELIGIONI. - ISSN 1970-5301. - Quaderno Monografico 8 Supplemento Rivista, Anno XX, n. 2-2025:(2025), pp. 61-90.
Laicità, bilateralità, serendipità. Dalla transizione ecologica all’innovazione dei paradigmi nei rapporti tra Stato e confessioni
Vincenzo Pacillo
2025
Abstract
The essay offers a reappraisal of State-religion relations through the lenses of innovation and serendipity. After defining innovation as the intentional and systemic transformation of the possible into the real, the Author draws on Christian Busch’s theory of serendipity – articulated through agency, surprise and value, and unfolding in the phases of enabling potentiality and materialization – as a technique for governing institutional uncertainty. This category is then connected with the constitutional principle of good administration (Art. 97 of the Italian Constitution), with the supreme principle of secularism (laicità), and with the principle of bilaterality (Art. 8), in order to outline a model of “serendipitous bilaterality” capable of turning religious pluralism into an opportunity for institutional learning. The argument is tested through the analysis of the ecological transition of places of worship, where the exemption from energy-certification duties has gradually evolved, through dialogue between public administrations and religious communities, into a laboratory of sustainable co-administration. Secularism thus emerges as a generative principle of normative cooperation, and sustainability as a shared semantics among law, technique and faith.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
V. Pacillo (2).pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
987.82 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
987.82 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris





