As decision-making processes are increasingly automated by the deployment of machine learning techniques, being able to a priori ensure the fairness of these models has become a concern of paramount importance. This is especially true in high-stake domains, where data are often provided as they are, i.e., without any additional insight from domain experts about the presence of possible sensitive attributes, such as gender, nationality, or religion. At the same time, data distribution may evolve over time, i.e., lead to drifts, potentially harmful for the performance of the deployed models. Thus, the interplay between: (i) proactively monitoring for degradation in accuracy and promptly retraining the models, as well as (ii) being able to grant fairness regardless of the possible bias within the data has further entangled this already tricky challenge. In this paper, we present and analyse a synthetically generated example of data distribution shift affecting the model performance, including its fairness. Then, we show how only focusing on singularly addressing either the accuracy drop, rather than the introduced bias, cannot completely solve the issues. In conclusion, we hint at the need for a holistic approach to mitigate both the problems as a possible research direction in this field.
Analysing the Impact of Data Distribution Shifts on Model Fairness in Machine Learning / Motta, F., Li, Y., Chen, H., Mandreoli, F., Missier, P.. - 4182:(2025), pp. 411-422. (33rd Symposium On Advanced Database Systems (SEBD 2025) Ischia, Italy 16-19 July).
Analysing the Impact of Data Distribution Shifts on Model Fairness in Machine Learning
Motta F.;Li Y.;Chen H.;Mandreoli F.;Missier P.
2025
Abstract
As decision-making processes are increasingly automated by the deployment of machine learning techniques, being able to a priori ensure the fairness of these models has become a concern of paramount importance. This is especially true in high-stake domains, where data are often provided as they are, i.e., without any additional insight from domain experts about the presence of possible sensitive attributes, such as gender, nationality, or religion. At the same time, data distribution may evolve over time, i.e., lead to drifts, potentially harmful for the performance of the deployed models. Thus, the interplay between: (i) proactively monitoring for degradation in accuracy and promptly retraining the models, as well as (ii) being able to grant fairness regardless of the possible bias within the data has further entangled this already tricky challenge. In this paper, we present and analyse a synthetically generated example of data distribution shift affecting the model performance, including its fairness. Then, we show how only focusing on singularly addressing either the accuracy drop, rather than the introduced bias, cannot completely solve the issues. In conclusion, we hint at the need for a holistic approach to mitigate both the problems as a possible research direction in this field.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
paper14.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
1.98 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.98 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




