This article aims to analyse the relationship between older people and digital technologies starting from a perspective that questions the Italian socio-legal context and arguing that systemic ageism produces a “grey digital divide” that is cultural and symbolic as well as technical. It surveys regulatory developments and shows a gap between legal accessibility norms and operational practice. Social and infrastructural barriers – technostress, credential management, poor usability and territorial disparities – reduce older people’s access to services. The authors advocate practices of co-design, intergenerational training, assisted digital access and the coexistence of analogue channels. Institutional reforms recommended include binding usability standards, monitoring and sanctions, public funding for lifelong digital literacy and local help desks. While AI offers inclusion opportunities (voice assistants, telemedicine), it may entrench bias if older people are underrepresented in datasets. The article calls for integrated legislative, educational and infrastructural policies to ensure an equitable, rights-based digital transition.
Older People and Digital Technologies: Regulatory, Social and Institutional Profiles / Casadei, T., Mondello, M.. - In: IUS ET SCIENTIA. - ISSN 2444-8478. - Número extraordinario. Monográfico: «Tecnologías, derechos y atención a los cuidados de larga duración»:(2025), pp. 13-35.
Older People and Digital Technologies: Regulatory, Social and Institutional Profiles
thomas casadei
;marco mondello
2025
Abstract
This article aims to analyse the relationship between older people and digital technologies starting from a perspective that questions the Italian socio-legal context and arguing that systemic ageism produces a “grey digital divide” that is cultural and symbolic as well as technical. It surveys regulatory developments and shows a gap between legal accessibility norms and operational practice. Social and infrastructural barriers – technostress, credential management, poor usability and territorial disparities – reduce older people’s access to services. The authors advocate practices of co-design, intergenerational training, assisted digital access and the coexistence of analogue channels. Institutional reforms recommended include binding usability standards, monitoring and sanctions, public funding for lifelong digital literacy and local help desks. While AI offers inclusion opportunities (voice assistants, telemedicine), it may entrench bias if older people are underrepresented in datasets. The article calls for integrated legislative, educational and infrastructural policies to ensure an equitable, rights-based digital transition.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
04_Casadei-Mondello.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
723.9 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
723.9 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




