Background – Robotic right hepatectomy (RRH) is increasingly utilized as a minimally invasive liver surgery approach, yet its comparative effectiveness against laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) remains debated. Complication prediction is crucial to efficiently choice the approach. This study aimed to compare RRH and LRH using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis and assess the predictive power of machine learning (ML), focusing on Random Forest-based feature selection. Methods – We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing RRH and LRH, performing a 1:1 PSM based on preoperative characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were compared, and significant predictors of textbook outcomes (TO) were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis. A Random Forest model was developed, selecting key variables for TO achieving prediction. Results – After PSM, 30 RRH and 30 LRH patients were compared. RRH was associated with increased clamping (80% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.0001) and longer clamping duration (44 min vs. 35 min, p = 0.209) but resulted in a shorter hospital stay (6 vs. 7.5 days, p = 0.004) and fewer complications (13.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified Robotic surgical approach (OR 0.282, p = 0.004), Chronic hepatitis/Cirrhosis (OR 1.90, p = 0.034), and estimated blood loss (OR 2.001, p = 0.014) as significant predictors of TO. Feature selection via ML confirmed robotic surgical approach as one of the most relevant factors, alongside operative duration, estimated blood loss, and lesion size, in determining postoperative outcomes. Conclusion – The choice of surgical approach is a key determinant of outcomes, as demonstrated by its significance in both multivariate analysis and ML-based feature selection. RRH shows potential advantages in reducing hospital stay and complications while requiring more intraoperative management. Machine learning, particularly Random Forest, enhances outcome prediction by identifying critical surgical factors, supporting a more tailored approach in hepatobiliary surgery.

Comparative analysis of robotic vs. laparoscopic right hepatectomy: propensity score matching and machine learning analysis for outcome prediction / Mazzotta, A. D.; Samer, D.; Salina, G.; Ratti, F.; Baldisseri, F.; Magistri, P.; Belli, A.; Ceccarelli, G.; Izzo, F.; Spampinato, M. G.; De' Angelis, N.; Pessaux, P.; Piardi, T.; Di Benedetto, F.; Ammendola, M.; Aldrighetti, L.; Mennini, G.; Tedeschi, M.; Memeo, R.; Soubrane, O.. - In: FRONTIERS IN SURGERY. - ISSN 2296-875X. - 13:(2026), pp. 1-2. [10.3389/fsurg.2026.1739640]

Comparative analysis of robotic vs. laparoscopic right hepatectomy: propensity score matching and machine learning analysis for outcome prediction

Magistri P.;Di Benedetto F.;
2026

Abstract

Background – Robotic right hepatectomy (RRH) is increasingly utilized as a minimally invasive liver surgery approach, yet its comparative effectiveness against laparoscopic right hepatectomy (LRH) remains debated. Complication prediction is crucial to efficiently choice the approach. This study aimed to compare RRH and LRH using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis and assess the predictive power of machine learning (ML), focusing on Random Forest-based feature selection. Methods – We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing RRH and LRH, performing a 1:1 PSM based on preoperative characteristics. Postoperative outcomes were compared, and significant predictors of textbook outcomes (TO) were identified through univariate and multivariate analysis. A Random Forest model was developed, selecting key variables for TO achieving prediction. Results – After PSM, 30 RRH and 30 LRH patients were compared. RRH was associated with increased clamping (80% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.0001) and longer clamping duration (44 min vs. 35 min, p = 0.209) but resulted in a shorter hospital stay (6 vs. 7.5 days, p = 0.004) and fewer complications (13.3% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified Robotic surgical approach (OR 0.282, p = 0.004), Chronic hepatitis/Cirrhosis (OR 1.90, p = 0.034), and estimated blood loss (OR 2.001, p = 0.014) as significant predictors of TO. Feature selection via ML confirmed robotic surgical approach as one of the most relevant factors, alongside operative duration, estimated blood loss, and lesion size, in determining postoperative outcomes. Conclusion – The choice of surgical approach is a key determinant of outcomes, as demonstrated by its significance in both multivariate analysis and ML-based feature selection. RRH shows potential advantages in reducing hospital stay and complications while requiring more intraoperative management. Machine learning, particularly Random Forest, enhances outcome prediction by identifying critical surgical factors, supporting a more tailored approach in hepatobiliary surgery.
2026
13
1
2
Comparative analysis of robotic vs. laparoscopic right hepatectomy: propensity score matching and machine learning analysis for outcome prediction / Mazzotta, A. D.; Samer, D.; Salina, G.; Ratti, F.; Baldisseri, F.; Magistri, P.; Belli, A.; Ceccarelli, G.; Izzo, F.; Spampinato, M. G.; De' Angelis, N.; Pessaux, P.; Piardi, T.; Di Benedetto, F.; Ammendola, M.; Aldrighetti, L.; Mennini, G.; Tedeschi, M.; Memeo, R.; Soubrane, O.. - In: FRONTIERS IN SURGERY. - ISSN 2296-875X. - 13:(2026), pp. 1-2. [10.3389/fsurg.2026.1739640]
Mazzotta, A. D.; Samer, D.; Salina, G.; Ratti, F.; Baldisseri, F.; Magistri, P.; Belli, A.; Ceccarelli, G.; Izzo, F.; Spampinato, M. G.; De' Angelis, ...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
fsurg-13-1739640.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza: [IR] creative-commons
Dimensione 360.5 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
360.5 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1408437
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact