Background: Septic shock is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) infections representing distinct clinical entities. The differences in clinical characteristics, immune response profiles, and effects of sepsis treatments between CA and HA septic shock have not been fully elucidated. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 726 adults with septic shock who were admitted to two ICUs at Modena University Hospital between January 2006 and September 2024. Patients were classified as having CA or HA septic shock based on the origin of the infection. Clinical, microbiological, and immunological data, treatments, and outcomes were analysed. Immune cell dynamics were assessed during the first week after the onset of the shock. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify predictors and the effects of treatment on ICU mortality. Results: Among 344 patients with CA and 382 with HA septic shock, those with CA had higher severity scores but lower ICU and in-hospital mortality. Patients with HA exhibited a higher prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and more comorbidities. Immunologically, CA survivors showed increasing lymphocyte counts over time, whereas HA survivors mainly demonstrated recovery in T helper cells. Therapeutic strategies were similar between groups; however, continuous renal replacement therapy was more frequent in patients with HA. Neither appropriate empiric antibiotics nor steroids or immunoglobulin therapy independently improved mortality in the multivariate analyses. Conclusions: CA and HA septic shock differ significantly in terms of clinical severity, microbiological aetiology, immune recovery patterns, and outcomes. The lack of mortality benefit from standard treatments highlights the need for personalised management strategies that integrate clinical, immunological, and microbiological data to optimise care in septic shock subpopulations.
Acquisition Origin Matters: Clinical, Microbiological and Immunological Characteristics and Treatment Effects in Community- vs. Hospital-Acquired Septic Shock / Coloretti, I., Tosi, M., Biagioni, E., Morselli, F., Munari, E., Bertolini, J., Ferrari, S., Meschiari, M., Franceschini, E., Nielsen, N.D., Busani, S., Girardis, M.. - In: ANTIBIOTICS. - ISSN 2079-6382. - 15:2(2026), pp. 169-176. [10.3390/antibiotics15020169]
Acquisition Origin Matters: Clinical, Microbiological and Immunological Characteristics and Treatment Effects in Community- vs. Hospital-Acquired Septic Shock
Coloretti I.;Biagioni E.;Munari E.;Franceschini E.;Nielsen N. D.;Girardis M.
2026
Abstract
Background: Septic shock is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, with community-acquired (CA) and hospital-acquired (HA) infections representing distinct clinical entities. The differences in clinical characteristics, immune response profiles, and effects of sepsis treatments between CA and HA septic shock have not been fully elucidated. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 726 adults with septic shock who were admitted to two ICUs at Modena University Hospital between January 2006 and September 2024. Patients were classified as having CA or HA septic shock based on the origin of the infection. Clinical, microbiological, and immunological data, treatments, and outcomes were analysed. Immune cell dynamics were assessed during the first week after the onset of the shock. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to identify predictors and the effects of treatment on ICU mortality. Results: Among 344 patients with CA and 382 with HA septic shock, those with CA had higher severity scores but lower ICU and in-hospital mortality. Patients with HA exhibited a higher prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms and more comorbidities. Immunologically, CA survivors showed increasing lymphocyte counts over time, whereas HA survivors mainly demonstrated recovery in T helper cells. Therapeutic strategies were similar between groups; however, continuous renal replacement therapy was more frequent in patients with HA. Neither appropriate empiric antibiotics nor steroids or immunoglobulin therapy independently improved mortality in the multivariate analyses. Conclusions: CA and HA septic shock differ significantly in terms of clinical severity, microbiological aetiology, immune recovery patterns, and outcomes. The lack of mortality benefit from standard treatments highlights the need for personalised management strategies that integrate clinical, immunological, and microbiological data to optimise care in septic shock subpopulations.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
ColorettiCAvsHA2026.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza:
[IR] creative-commons
Dimensione
642.6 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
642.6 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




