Group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains a major cause of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis worldwide, despite the widespread use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillin G and ampicillin, remain the cornerstone of both GBS prophylaxis and neonatal treatment, supported by sustained susceptibility, favorable pharmacokinetics, and extensive clinical experience. However, increasing global resistance to macrolides and lincosamides has markedly reduced the reliability of clindamycin and erythromycin, which are commonly used as second-line agents in women with severe penicillin allergy. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on antibiotic strategies for the prevention and treatment of neonatal GBS disease, with a particular focus on antimicrobial resistance patterns and their clinical implications. Available surveillance data demonstrate substantial geographic variability in resistance but consistently low resistance to beta-lactams and vancomycin. These trends have expanded the role of vancomycin in IAP for women with high-risk beta-lactam allergy and in neonatal treatment when first-line agents are contraindicated. Alternative agents such as linezolid and teicoplanin exhibit activity against GBS, but their use remains limited by sparse neonatal data and pharmacokinetic variability. Ongoing antimicrobial surveillance, susceptibility-guided therapy, and stewardship initiatives are essential to preserve effective GBS prevention and treatment strategies.
Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Treatment of Neonatal Group B Streptococcus Disease in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance / Tzialla, C.; Salomè, S.; Mondì, V.; Salvo, V.; Berardi, A.. - In: ANTIBIOTICS. - ISSN 2079-6382. - 15:3(2026), pp. 1-9. [10.3390/antibiotics15030306]
Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Treatment of Neonatal Group B Streptococcus Disease in the Era of Antimicrobial Resistance
Berardi A.
2026
Abstract
Group B Streptococcus (GBS) remains a major cause of early- and late-onset neonatal sepsis worldwide, despite the widespread use of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). beta-lactam antibiotics, including penicillin G and ampicillin, remain the cornerstone of both GBS prophylaxis and neonatal treatment, supported by sustained susceptibility, favorable pharmacokinetics, and extensive clinical experience. However, increasing global resistance to macrolides and lincosamides has markedly reduced the reliability of clindamycin and erythromycin, which are commonly used as second-line agents in women with severe penicillin allergy. This narrative review summarizes current evidence on antibiotic strategies for the prevention and treatment of neonatal GBS disease, with a particular focus on antimicrobial resistance patterns and their clinical implications. Available surveillance data demonstrate substantial geographic variability in resistance but consistently low resistance to beta-lactams and vancomycin. These trends have expanded the role of vancomycin in IAP for women with high-risk beta-lactam allergy and in neonatal treatment when first-line agents are contraindicated. Alternative agents such as linezolid and teicoplanin exhibit activity against GBS, but their use remains limited by sparse neonatal data and pharmacokinetic variability. Ongoing antimicrobial surveillance, susceptibility-guided therapy, and stewardship initiatives are essential to preserve effective GBS prevention and treatment strategies.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
GBS, profilassi e tp (Tzialla, Antibiotics 2026).pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
304.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
304.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




