Since the pandemic, vaccinations have become an issue that has triggered much public debate. Although several scholars have focused on the discourse of social media and traditional news media, parliamentary discourse on this issue has received little attention. Using the Hansard Corpus of speeches collected from the House of Commons between 1803 and 2005, and a recent corpus of speeches on Covid-19, we examine how vaccines have been presented in British Parliament over the years. Taking into account the main peaks in which the word vaccine occurs and observing frequency, collocates, and phraseology, we trace significant differences in discourse on vaccines, reflecting changing values and differences in the respective arguments of science and political power. While in the early 19th century the focus was on the vaccine itself, starting from the 1950s’ attention was more on research and investment. The turn of the century witnesses negative attitudes towards vaccines, while the pandemic shows an increasing need for promotional discourse.
Vaccines discourse : A diachronic case study / Bondi, Marina; Nocella, Jessica Jane; Paganelli, Roberto. - In: TOKEN. - ISSN 2299-5900. - 18:(2025), pp. 299-323. [10.25951/14402]
Vaccines discourse : A diachronic case study
Marina Bondi;Jessica Jane Nocella;
2025
Abstract
Since the pandemic, vaccinations have become an issue that has triggered much public debate. Although several scholars have focused on the discourse of social media and traditional news media, parliamentary discourse on this issue has received little attention. Using the Hansard Corpus of speeches collected from the House of Commons between 1803 and 2005, and a recent corpus of speeches on Covid-19, we examine how vaccines have been presented in British Parliament over the years. Taking into account the main peaks in which the word vaccine occurs and observing frequency, collocates, and phraseology, we trace significant differences in discourse on vaccines, reflecting changing values and differences in the respective arguments of science and political power. While in the early 19th century the focus was on the vaccine itself, starting from the 1950s’ attention was more on research and investment. The turn of the century witnesses negative attitudes towards vaccines, while the pandemic shows an increasing need for promotional discourse.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bondi_Nocella_Paganelli 2025.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
429.03 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
429.03 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




