Since the pandemic, vaccinations have become an issue that has triggered much public debate. Although several scholars have focused on the discourse of social media and traditional news media, parliamentary discourse on this issue has received little attention. Using the Hansard Corpus of speeches collected from the House of Commons between 1803 and 2005, and a recent corpus of speeches on Covid-19, we examine how vaccines have been presented in British Parliament over the years. Taking into account the main peaks in which the word vaccine occurs and observing frequency, collocates, and phraseology, we trace significant differences in discourse on vaccines, reflecting changing values and differences in the respective arguments of science and political power. While in the early 19th century the focus was on the vaccine itself, starting from the 1950s’ attention was more on research and investment. The turn of the century witnesses negative attitudes towards vaccines, while the pandemic shows an increasing need for promotional discourse.

Vaccines discourse : A diachronic case study / Bondi, Marina; Nocella, Jessica Jane; Paganelli, Roberto. - In: TOKEN. - ISSN 2299-5900. - 18:(2025), pp. 299-323. [10.25951/14402]

Vaccines discourse : A diachronic case study

Marina Bondi;Jessica Jane Nocella;
2025

Abstract

Since the pandemic, vaccinations have become an issue that has triggered much public debate. Although several scholars have focused on the discourse of social media and traditional news media, parliamentary discourse on this issue has received little attention. Using the Hansard Corpus of speeches collected from the House of Commons between 1803 and 2005, and a recent corpus of speeches on Covid-19, we examine how vaccines have been presented in British Parliament over the years. Taking into account the main peaks in which the word vaccine occurs and observing frequency, collocates, and phraseology, we trace significant differences in discourse on vaccines, reflecting changing values and differences in the respective arguments of science and political power. While in the early 19th century the focus was on the vaccine itself, starting from the 1950s’ attention was more on research and investment. The turn of the century witnesses negative attitudes towards vaccines, while the pandemic shows an increasing need for promotional discourse.
2025
Inglese
18
299
323
open
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Contributo su RIVISTA::Articolo su rivista
262
Vaccines discourse : A diachronic case study / Bondi, Marina; Nocella, Jessica Jane; Paganelli, Roberto. - In: TOKEN. - ISSN 2299-5900. - 18:(2025), pp. 299-323. [10.25951/14402]
Bondi, Marina; Nocella, Jessica Jane; Paganelli, Roberto
3
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bondi_Nocella_Paganelli 2025.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 429.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
429.03 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1405349
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact