Purpose: We systematically compare the intermodality and interreader agreement in age-related macular degeneration(AMD)-associated neovascularization assessment for optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images obtained using different slabs. Methods: We collected data from 48 patients (50 eyes) with type 1 or 2 neovascularization (NV) and AMD. Subjects were imaged with a swept source (SS)-OCTA system. For each eye, three OCTA en face images generated from three different slabs were exported: (1) the outer retina to choriocapillaris (ORCC) image, (2) the choriocapillaris (CC) image, and (3) the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-RPE fit image. Each image was graded by two readers to assess interreader variability and a single image for each modality was used to assess the intermodality variability. Results: In the assessment of type 1 NV, mean absolute interreader difference between measured NV areas was 0.19, 0.30, and 0.16 mm2 for ORCC, CC, and RPE-RPE fit images, respectively. Similarly, the coefficient of repeatability (CR) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated that the RPE-RPE fit assessment was characterized by the highest interreader reproducibility. Type 1 NV size was 0.58 mm2 (0.30–1.60 mm2) on ORCC images, 0.00 mm2 (0.00–0.36 mm2) on CC images (P = 0.002 vs. ORCC), and 0.62 mm2 (0.31–2.03 mm2) on RPE-RPE fit images (P < 0.0001 vs. CC, P = 0.041 vs. ORCC). Conclusions: The RPE-RPE fit OCTA images have the highest interreader agreement and deliver larger measurements in type 1 lesions. Translational Relevance: OCTA imaging may be used in ongoing trials of potential novel treatments for NV.
A comparison among different automatically segmented slabs to assess neovascular AMD using swept source OCT angiography / Parravano, M., Borrelli, E., Sacconi, R., Costanzo, E., Marchese, A., Manca, D., Varano, M., Bandello, F., Querques, G.. - In: TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY. - ISSN 2164-2591. - 8:2(2019), pp. 1-8. [10.1167/tvst.8.2.8]
A comparison among different automatically segmented slabs to assess neovascular AMD using swept source OCT angiography
Querques G.
2019
Abstract
Purpose: We systematically compare the intermodality and interreader agreement in age-related macular degeneration(AMD)-associated neovascularization assessment for optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images obtained using different slabs. Methods: We collected data from 48 patients (50 eyes) with type 1 or 2 neovascularization (NV) and AMD. Subjects were imaged with a swept source (SS)-OCTA system. For each eye, three OCTA en face images generated from three different slabs were exported: (1) the outer retina to choriocapillaris (ORCC) image, (2) the choriocapillaris (CC) image, and (3) the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)-RPE fit image. Each image was graded by two readers to assess interreader variability and a single image for each modality was used to assess the intermodality variability. Results: In the assessment of type 1 NV, mean absolute interreader difference between measured NV areas was 0.19, 0.30, and 0.16 mm2 for ORCC, CC, and RPE-RPE fit images, respectively. Similarly, the coefficient of repeatability (CR) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated that the RPE-RPE fit assessment was characterized by the highest interreader reproducibility. Type 1 NV size was 0.58 mm2 (0.30–1.60 mm2) on ORCC images, 0.00 mm2 (0.00–0.36 mm2) on CC images (P = 0.002 vs. ORCC), and 0.62 mm2 (0.31–2.03 mm2) on RPE-RPE fit images (P < 0.0001 vs. CC, P = 0.041 vs. ORCC). Conclusions: The RPE-RPE fit OCTA images have the highest interreader agreement and deliver larger measurements in type 1 lesions. Translational Relevance: OCTA imaging may be used in ongoing trials of potential novel treatments for NV.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
i2164-2591-8-2-8.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza:
[IR] creative-commons
Dimensione
753.6 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
753.6 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




