To investigate the variability in subthreshold laser treatment plans for patients with diabetic macular edema or central serous chorioretinopathy. Diagnostic images from 20 patients were utilized, and 25 retina specialists generated subthreshold treatment plans along with a self-rated experience level. Evaluation comprised of i) Area Variability (AV): quantifies the consensus regarding the covered area and is the difference between the areas planned by 75% and 25% of the participants ii) mean Centroid Distance (CD): level of agreement on the localization of a treatment. Subgroup analysis investigated the impact of participants’ experience levels, utilizing the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. The predominant plan style is a targeted treatment approach (92%) and avoidance of subfoveal region (89%). Mean CD is 71.0 ± 37.5 pixels (≈half disc diameter) and mean AV is 9.8%±8.9%. A slight difference is observed between the 50-75% areas, but a notable distinction exists between the 25-50% areas. Subgroup analysis revealed CD and AV value of 75.9 pixels and 24% in the lower experience level group as opposed to 55.9 pixels and 8.6% in the higher experience level group. There is significant variability in treatment planning which reduces with increased experience of retina specialists. While consensus is observed around focal points, differences in the surrounding extents persist.
Variability of thermal subthreshold retinal laser treatment plans / Rahn, U., Rahn, C.-D., Arora, S., Ng, E., Kozak, I., Chhablani, J., Prasad, P., Ziemmssen, F., Ziegler, M., Vigo, J.F., Fernandez, J.A.R., Filloy, A.R., Querques, G., Hernandez, J.M., Miura, Y., Heuvels, P., Dorta, L.C., Bormann, C., Ares, I., Amoroso, F., et al.. - In: SCIENTIFIC REPORTS. - ISSN 2045-2322. - 14:1(2024), pp. N/A-N/A. [10.1038/s41598-024-73763-4]
Variability of thermal subthreshold retinal laser treatment plans
Querques G.;
2024
Abstract
To investigate the variability in subthreshold laser treatment plans for patients with diabetic macular edema or central serous chorioretinopathy. Diagnostic images from 20 patients were utilized, and 25 retina specialists generated subthreshold treatment plans along with a self-rated experience level. Evaluation comprised of i) Area Variability (AV): quantifies the consensus regarding the covered area and is the difference between the areas planned by 75% and 25% of the participants ii) mean Centroid Distance (CD): level of agreement on the localization of a treatment. Subgroup analysis investigated the impact of participants’ experience levels, utilizing the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test. The predominant plan style is a targeted treatment approach (92%) and avoidance of subfoveal region (89%). Mean CD is 71.0 ± 37.5 pixels (≈half disc diameter) and mean AV is 9.8%±8.9%. A slight difference is observed between the 50-75% areas, but a notable distinction exists between the 25-50% areas. Subgroup analysis revealed CD and AV value of 75.9 pixels and 24% in the lower experience level group as opposed to 55.9 pixels and 8.6% in the higher experience level group. There is significant variability in treatment planning which reduces with increased experience of retina specialists. While consensus is observed around focal points, differences in the surrounding extents persist.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
unpaywall-bitstream--1993970262.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza:
[IR] creative-commons
Dimensione
1.67 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.67 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




