The European Commission requests EFSA to provide scientific opinions in the field of plant health in accordance with Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002. Annex VI of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 lists plants, plant products and other objects whose introduction into the Union from certain third countries is prohibited. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by 1- to 2-year-old grafted bare root plants without leaves of Vitis spp. from the Republic of Moldova, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Moldova. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated for their relevance for this opinion. Eight pests (one EU quarantine pest and seven Vitis spp. RNQPs) that fulfilled all the criteria were selected for further evaluation. For the selected pests, the risk mitigation measures implemented in Moldova and described in the technical dossier were evaluated. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom considering the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with grapevine fleck virus (GFkV, Maculavirus vitis) and 'Candidatus Phytoplasma solani' being the pests most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that 9900 or more units per 10,000 will be free from the above-mentioned pests.

Commodity risk assessment of Vitis spp. plants from Moldova / Null, Null; Civera, Antonio Vicent; Baptista, Paula; Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet; Cubero, Jaime; Cunniffe, Nik; De La Peña, Eduardo; Desneux, Nicolas; Filipiak, Anna; Gonthier, Paolo; Hasiów‐jaroszewska, Beata; Jactel, Hervé; Landa, Blanca B.; Maistrello, Lara; Makowski, David; Milonas, Panagiotis; Papadopoulos, Nikos T.; Potting, Roel; Susi, Hanna; Van Der Gaag, Dirk Jan; Gómez, Pedro; Justesen, Annemarie Fejer; Lucchi, Andrea; Urek, Gregor; Yuen, Jonathan; Zappala, Lucia; Bernardo, Umberto; Bubici, Giovanni; Carluccio, Anna Vittoria; Chiumenti, Michela; Di Serio, Francesco; Fanelli, Elena; Kariampa, Paraskevi; Marzachì, Cristina; Kaczmarek, Agata; Matic, Louise; Mosbach‐schulz, Olaf; Berlin, Anna. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 24:1(2026), pp. 1-99. [10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9807]

Commodity risk assessment of Vitis spp. plants from Moldova

Maistrello, Lara;
2026

Abstract

The European Commission requests EFSA to provide scientific opinions in the field of plant health in accordance with Article 29 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002. Annex VI of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2072 lists plants, plant products and other objects whose introduction into the Union from certain third countries is prohibited. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by 1- to 2-year-old grafted bare root plants without leaves of Vitis spp. from the Republic of Moldova, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by Moldova. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated for their relevance for this opinion. Eight pests (one EU quarantine pest and seven Vitis spp. RNQPs) that fulfilled all the criteria were selected for further evaluation. For the selected pests, the risk mitigation measures implemented in Moldova and described in the technical dossier were evaluated. For the selected pests, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom considering the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The degree of pest freedom varies among the pests evaluated, with grapevine fleck virus (GFkV, Maculavirus vitis) and 'Candidatus Phytoplasma solani' being the pests most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated with 95% certainty that 9900 or more units per 10,000 will be free from the above-mentioned pests.
2026
7-gen-2026
Inglese
24
1
e9807
1
99
https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9807
European Union; pathway risk assessment; plant health; plant pest; quarantine pest
Goal 2: Zero hunger
Goal 12: Responsible consumption and production
Goal 15: Life on land
open
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Contributo su RIVISTA::Articolo su rivista
262
Commodity risk assessment of Vitis spp. plants from Moldova / Null, Null; Civera, Antonio Vicent; Baptista, Paula; Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet; Cubero, Jaime; Cunniffe, Nik; De La Peña, Eduardo; Desneux, Nicolas; Filipiak, Anna; Gonthier, Paolo; Hasiów‐jaroszewska, Beata; Jactel, Hervé; Landa, Blanca B.; Maistrello, Lara; Makowski, David; Milonas, Panagiotis; Papadopoulos, Nikos T.; Potting, Roel; Susi, Hanna; Van Der Gaag, Dirk Jan; Gómez, Pedro; Justesen, Annemarie Fejer; Lucchi, Andrea; Urek, Gregor; Yuen, Jonathan; Zappala, Lucia; Bernardo, Umberto; Bubici, Giovanni; Carluccio, Anna Vittoria; Chiumenti, Michela; Di Serio, Francesco; Fanelli, Elena; Kariampa, Paraskevi; Marzachì, Cristina; Kaczmarek, Agata; Matic, Louise; Mosbach‐schulz, Olaf; Berlin, Anna. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 24:1(2026), pp. 1-99. [10.2903/j.efsa.2026.9807]
Null, Null; Civera, Antonio Vicent; Baptista, Paula; Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet; Cubero, Jaime; Cunniffe, Nik; De La Peña, Eduardo; Desneux, Nicolas; F...espandi
38
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EFSA Journal - 2026 - - Commodity risk assessment of Vitis spp plants from Moldova.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza: [IR] creative-commons
Dimensione 3.44 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.44 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1393671
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact