Background: The A-BRAVE trial evaluated the efficacy of avelumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, as adjuvant treatment of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at high risk. Patients and methods: A-BRAVE is a phase III study that randomly assigned patients with high-risk early TNBC to 1 year of avelumab versus observation, after completion of standard surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. High-risk was defined as either: (i) ≥pN2/any pT, pN1/pT2, or pN0/pT3 after primary surgery (stratum A); or (ii) invasive residual disease (breast and/or nodes) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (stratum B). Coprimary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and stratum B populations. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and DFS in PD-L1-positive patients. PD-L1 was evaluated in treatment-naïve tumor samples by immunohistochemistry (73-10 RUO assay, Agilent Technologies) and digital pathology. Results: From June 2016 to October 2020, 466 patients were randomly assigned: 383 entered stratum B (82%) and 83 entered stratum A (18%). At a median follow-up of 52.1 months, avelumab did not significantly improve DFS in the ITT population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.09, P = 0.172; 3-year DFS estimates were 68.3% for avelumab versus 63.2%], or in stratum B (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.58-1.10, P = 0.170; 3-year DFS estimates were 66.9% for avelumab versus 60.7%). In a descriptive analysis, avelumab reduced the hazard of OS events: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97. The 3-year OS estimates for avelumab and control arm were 84.8% (95% CI 79.5% to 88.8%) and 76.3% (95% CI 70.1% to 81.3%), respectively. PD-L1 status was prognostic but not predictive for avelumab benefit in terms of DFS (test for interaction P = 0.155). Conclusions: For patients with TNBC at high risk of relapse who complete standard treatment with surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, 1 year of adjuvant avelumab versus observation did not improve DFS. However, a descriptive analysis suggests a potential favorable impact on OS.
A-BRAVE trial: a phase III randomized trial with anti-PD-L1 avelumab in high-risk triple-negative early breast cancer patients / Conte, Pf; Dieci, Mv; Bisagni, G; Schmid, P; Zambelli, A; Piacentini, F; De Laurentiis, M; Favaretto, Ag; Tamberi, S; Bianchi, Gv; Zamagni, C; Cinieri, S; Corsi, Dc; Del Mastro, L; Ferro, A; Gennari, A; Mion, M; Musolino, A; Nicolé, L; Del Bianco, P; De Salvo, Gl; Guarneri, V.. - In: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY. - ISSN 0923-7534. - (2025), pp. 1492-1502. [10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.005]
A-BRAVE trial: a phase III randomized trial with anti-PD-L1 avelumab in high-risk triple-negative early breast cancer patients.
Conte PF;Dieci MV;Piacentini F;Guarneri V.
2025
Abstract
Background: The A-BRAVE trial evaluated the efficacy of avelumab, an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody, as adjuvant treatment of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at high risk. Patients and methods: A-BRAVE is a phase III study that randomly assigned patients with high-risk early TNBC to 1 year of avelumab versus observation, after completion of standard surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy. High-risk was defined as either: (i) ≥pN2/any pT, pN1/pT2, or pN0/pT3 after primary surgery (stratum A); or (ii) invasive residual disease (breast and/or nodes) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (stratum B). Coprimary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and stratum B populations. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and DFS in PD-L1-positive patients. PD-L1 was evaluated in treatment-naïve tumor samples by immunohistochemistry (73-10 RUO assay, Agilent Technologies) and digital pathology. Results: From June 2016 to October 2020, 466 patients were randomly assigned: 383 entered stratum B (82%) and 83 entered stratum A (18%). At a median follow-up of 52.1 months, avelumab did not significantly improve DFS in the ITT population [hazard ratio (HR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.09, P = 0.172; 3-year DFS estimates were 68.3% for avelumab versus 63.2%], or in stratum B (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.58-1.10, P = 0.170; 3-year DFS estimates were 66.9% for avelumab versus 60.7%). In a descriptive analysis, avelumab reduced the hazard of OS events: HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.45-0.97. The 3-year OS estimates for avelumab and control arm were 84.8% (95% CI 79.5% to 88.8%) and 76.3% (95% CI 70.1% to 81.3%), respectively. PD-L1 status was prognostic but not predictive for avelumab benefit in terms of DFS (test for interaction P = 0.155). Conclusions: For patients with TNBC at high risk of relapse who complete standard treatment with surgery and (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, 1 year of adjuvant avelumab versus observation did not improve DFS. However, a descriptive analysis suggests a potential favorable impact on OS.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
BRAVE trial.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
1.03 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.03 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




