Purpose – Food safety has become an increasing concern for consumers, stakeholders, and firms, all of which aim to reduce risks and enhance public health and well-being. This empirical study analyses the nature and the main features of the food safety communication strategies of agri-food firms by examining the various communication tools they adopt. In particular, it examines whether distinct communication strategies exist among agri-food SMEs based on their mix of traditional and digital communication tools, and how these strategies correlate with perceived business performance. Design/methodology/approach – An online survey was conducted on Italian SMEs. Cluster analysis was performed to identify different groups of firms based on their food safety communication strategies in terms of the communication mix they adopted. Findings – The findings reveal different clusters that use a heterogeneous mix of communication channels. Specifically, four clusters were identified denominated as: integrated communicators, non-communicators, traditional communicators, and essential communicators, ranging from very low to highly diverse mixes of communication channels. Each cluster has a different impact on business performance. Research limitations/implications – The main limitation of this research is that it only examines only Italian agri-food firms. This empirical study contributes to the literature on the communication and digitalisation of SMEs and agri-food firms. Suggestions for future research include an in-depth study of best practices for effective food safety communication in firms in the broader sector.
COMMUNICATING FOOD SAFETY IN THE AGRI-FOOD FIRMS: THE PERCEPTION OF ITALIAN ENTREPRENEURS / Gabbianelli, Linda; Conti, Emanuela; Pencarelli, Tonino. - In: ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA. - ISSN 1971-5293. - 32:1-2 2024(2025), pp. 23-44.
COMMUNICATING FOOD SAFETY IN THE AGRI-FOOD FIRMS: THE PERCEPTION OF ITALIAN ENTREPRENEURS
Linda Gabbianelli
;
2025
Abstract
Purpose – Food safety has become an increasing concern for consumers, stakeholders, and firms, all of which aim to reduce risks and enhance public health and well-being. This empirical study analyses the nature and the main features of the food safety communication strategies of agri-food firms by examining the various communication tools they adopt. In particular, it examines whether distinct communication strategies exist among agri-food SMEs based on their mix of traditional and digital communication tools, and how these strategies correlate with perceived business performance. Design/methodology/approach – An online survey was conducted on Italian SMEs. Cluster analysis was performed to identify different groups of firms based on their food safety communication strategies in terms of the communication mix they adopted. Findings – The findings reveal different clusters that use a heterogeneous mix of communication channels. Specifically, four clusters were identified denominated as: integrated communicators, non-communicators, traditional communicators, and essential communicators, ranging from very low to highly diverse mixes of communication channels. Each cluster has a different impact on business performance. Research limitations/implications – The main limitation of this research is that it only examines only Italian agri-food firms. This empirical study contributes to the literature on the communication and digitalisation of SMEs and agri-food firms. Suggestions for future research include an in-depth study of best practices for effective food safety communication in firms in the broader sector.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Pubblicazione Esperienza Impresa.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione
988.8 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
988.8 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




