While in some countries judicial associations have long been objects of scholarly interest, the burgeoning debate over judicial independence in Europe and the growing interconnection between associations of different states have broadened the discussion beyond strictly domestic borders. The adoption of a specific opinion on judicial associations by the Consultative Council of European Judges on November 6, 2020 (No. 23/2020) is further evidence of the increasing transnational attention to the topic. To draft such an Opinion, questionnaires were submitted to Council of Europe (CoE) Member States. By analysing and classifying the replies of the CoE Member States, we first intend to offer a comprehensive assessment of the European experiences to highlight convergences and divergences. Secondly, we aim to juxtapose the representation of judicial associations as it emerges from the replies with the one debated in legal scholarship. To this end, we will try to understand the role of judicial associations in promoting and upholding judicial independence, with particular emphasis on the Italian Case.

Judicial Associations Across Europe: Balancing the Narrative / Cavallini, Daniela; Ferrari, Eleonora; Vinceti, Silvio Roberto. - In: HAGUE JOURNAL ON THE RULE OF LAW. - ISSN 1876-4045. - 17:3(2025), pp. 1-22. [10.1007/s40803-025-00260-9]

Judicial Associations Across Europe: Balancing the Narrative

Vinceti, Silvio Roberto
2025

Abstract

While in some countries judicial associations have long been objects of scholarly interest, the burgeoning debate over judicial independence in Europe and the growing interconnection between associations of different states have broadened the discussion beyond strictly domestic borders. The adoption of a specific opinion on judicial associations by the Consultative Council of European Judges on November 6, 2020 (No. 23/2020) is further evidence of the increasing transnational attention to the topic. To draft such an Opinion, questionnaires were submitted to Council of Europe (CoE) Member States. By analysing and classifying the replies of the CoE Member States, we first intend to offer a comprehensive assessment of the European experiences to highlight convergences and divergences. Secondly, we aim to juxtapose the representation of judicial associations as it emerges from the replies with the one debated in legal scholarship. To this end, we will try to understand the role of judicial associations in promoting and upholding judicial independence, with particular emphasis on the Italian Case.
2025
1-set-2025
17
3
1
22
Judicial Associations Across Europe: Balancing the Narrative / Cavallini, Daniela; Ferrari, Eleonora; Vinceti, Silvio Roberto. - In: HAGUE JOURNAL ON THE RULE OF LAW. - ISSN 1876-4045. - 17:3(2025), pp. 1-22. [10.1007/s40803-025-00260-9]
Cavallini, Daniela; Ferrari, Eleonora; Vinceti, Silvio Roberto
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
unpaywall-bitstream--18862144.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza: [IR] creative-commons
Dimensione 687.31 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
687.31 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1387829
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact