: Atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based nanoindentation enables investigation of the mechanical response of biological materials at a subcellular scale. However, quantitative estimates of mechanical parameters such as the elastic modulus (E) remain unreliable because the influence of sample roughness on E measurements at the nanoscale is still poorly understood. This study re-examines the interpretation of roughness from a more rigorous perspective and validates an experimental methodology to extract roughness at each nanoindentation site-i.e., the local roughness γs-with which the corresponding E value can be accurately correlated. Cortical regions of a murine tibia cross-section, characterized by complex nanoscale morphology, were selected as a testbed. Eighty non-overlapping nanoindentations were performed using two different AFM tips, maintaining a maximum penetration depth of 10 nm for each measurement. Our results show a slight decreasing trend of E versus γs (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ = -0.27187). A total of 90% of the E values are reliable when γs < 10 nm (coefficient of determination R2 > 0.90), although low γs values are associated with significant dispersion around E (γs = 0) = E0 = 1.18 GPa, with variations exceeding 50%. These findings are consistent with a qualitative tip-to-sample contact model that accounts for the pronounced roughness heterogeneity typical of bone topography at the nanoscale.
On the Interplay Between Roughness and Elastic Modulus at the Nanoscale: A Methodology Study with Bone as Model Material / Gambardella, Alessandro; Marchiori, Gregorio; Maglio, Melania; Boi, Marco; Montesissa, Matteo; Bertacchini, Jessika; Biressi, Stefano; Baldini, Nicola; Giavaresi, Gianluca; Bontempi, Marco. - In: JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS. - ISSN 2079-4983. - 16:8(2025), pp. 1-4. [10.3390/jfb16080276]
On the Interplay Between Roughness and Elastic Modulus at the Nanoscale: A Methodology Study with Bone as Model Material
Gambardella, Alessandro;Bertacchini, Jessika;
2025
Abstract
: Atomic force microscopy (AFM)-based nanoindentation enables investigation of the mechanical response of biological materials at a subcellular scale. However, quantitative estimates of mechanical parameters such as the elastic modulus (E) remain unreliable because the influence of sample roughness on E measurements at the nanoscale is still poorly understood. This study re-examines the interpretation of roughness from a more rigorous perspective and validates an experimental methodology to extract roughness at each nanoindentation site-i.e., the local roughness γs-with which the corresponding E value can be accurately correlated. Cortical regions of a murine tibia cross-section, characterized by complex nanoscale morphology, were selected as a testbed. Eighty non-overlapping nanoindentations were performed using two different AFM tips, maintaining a maximum penetration depth of 10 nm for each measurement. Our results show a slight decreasing trend of E versus γs (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient ρ = -0.27187). A total of 90% of the E values are reliable when γs < 10 nm (coefficient of determination R2 > 0.90), although low γs values are associated with significant dispersion around E (γs = 0) = E0 = 1.18 GPa, with variations exceeding 50%. These findings are consistent with a qualitative tip-to-sample contact model that accounts for the pronounced roughness heterogeneity typical of bone topography at the nanoscale.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
jfb-16-00276.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza:
[IR] creative-commons
Dimensione
1.49 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.49 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




