This paper examines the environmental sustainability of European companies through the use of three multi-criteria decision-making methods: TOPSIS, PROMETHEE II, and SIR. The companies listed in the STOXX Europe 600 index, divided into ten economic sectors, are evaluated using 110 environmental criteria organized into three categories: Emissions, Innovation, and Resource Use. The use of multiple methods allows for a comprehensive assessment of corporate sustainability by capturing different ranking perspectives. This approach mitigates the limitations associated with relying on a single decision-making model and enhances the reliability of the evaluation process. A comparison with the LSEG ranking is provided to assess the consistency of these multi-criteria methods with an established sustainability benchmark. The results indicate that while PROMETHEE II and SIR exhibit a strong correlation, TOPSIS generates significantly different rankings, highlighting the influence of methodological differences on sustainability assessments. Moreover, the findings reveal a general improvement in corporate environmental performance over time, with certain companies consistently achieving high rankings, while others struggle to keep pace with evolving sustainability standards. The study provides relevant insights for investors, policymakers, and corporate executives, offering tools to improve sustainability practices and promote responsible investment

Barua Mimbela, C. A., S., Muzzioli e L., Vitale. "The assessment of environmental sustainability of European companies: a MCDM approach" Working paper, DEMB WORKING PAPER SERIES, Dipartimento di Economia Marco Biagi, 2025.

The assessment of environmental sustainability of European companies: a MCDM approach

Barua Mimbela, C. A.;Muzzioli, S.;Vitale, L.
2025

Abstract

This paper examines the environmental sustainability of European companies through the use of three multi-criteria decision-making methods: TOPSIS, PROMETHEE II, and SIR. The companies listed in the STOXX Europe 600 index, divided into ten economic sectors, are evaluated using 110 environmental criteria organized into three categories: Emissions, Innovation, and Resource Use. The use of multiple methods allows for a comprehensive assessment of corporate sustainability by capturing different ranking perspectives. This approach mitigates the limitations associated with relying on a single decision-making model and enhances the reliability of the evaluation process. A comparison with the LSEG ranking is provided to assess the consistency of these multi-criteria methods with an established sustainability benchmark. The results indicate that while PROMETHEE II and SIR exhibit a strong correlation, TOPSIS generates significantly different rankings, highlighting the influence of methodological differences on sustainability assessments. Moreover, the findings reveal a general improvement in corporate environmental performance over time, with certain companies consistently achieving high rankings, while others struggle to keep pace with evolving sustainability standards. The study provides relevant insights for investors, policymakers, and corporate executives, offering tools to improve sustainability practices and promote responsible investment
2025
Maggio
Barua Mimbela, C. A.; Muzzioli, S.; Vitale, L.
Barua Mimbela, C. A., S., Muzzioli e L., Vitale. "The assessment of environmental sustainability of European companies: a MCDM approach" Working paper, DEMB WORKING PAPER SERIES, Dipartimento di Economia Marco Biagi, 2025.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
0258.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Dimensione 4.82 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.82 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1380614
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact