The recent events of the Covid-19 pandemic and the renewed upsurge of social movements in the late 2010s, such as Black Lives Matter and #MeToo, have brought public attention to the question of inequality and, for that matter, to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI). Set against this background, the aim of the study is to investigate whether, and if so how, EDI is transparently framed in the CSR reports belonging to a sample of rail companies operating in different countries and continents. In an effort to explore the companies’ attitudes towards EDI as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, the analysis examines a sample of CSR reports that were disclosed in 2018 (pre-Covid-19) and 2022 (post-Covid-19). In particular, the sections of the reports covering EDI topics are scrutinized quantitatively with the support of corpus linguistics tools to identify frequent lexico-grammatical patterns, and qualitatively through discourse analysis to verify whether the information provided is transparent, namely complete, understandable and reliable. The comparative and micro-diachronic study sets out to highlight similarities and differences in the discourse strategies adopted by the rail companies for (un)transparent reporting of information relating to diversity and inclusion issues.
Diversity, Inclusion and Transparency in Rail Companies’ Communication / Malavasi, D.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS. - ISSN 1948-5425. - 17:3(2025), pp. 41-55. [10.5296/ijl.v17i3.22861]
Diversity, Inclusion and Transparency in Rail Companies’ Communication
Malavasi, D.
2025
Abstract
The recent events of the Covid-19 pandemic and the renewed upsurge of social movements in the late 2010s, such as Black Lives Matter and #MeToo, have brought public attention to the question of inequality and, for that matter, to Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI). Set against this background, the aim of the study is to investigate whether, and if so how, EDI is transparently framed in the CSR reports belonging to a sample of rail companies operating in different countries and continents. In an effort to explore the companies’ attitudes towards EDI as a consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic, the analysis examines a sample of CSR reports that were disclosed in 2018 (pre-Covid-19) and 2022 (post-Covid-19). In particular, the sections of the reports covering EDI topics are scrutinized quantitatively with the support of corpus linguistics tools to identify frequent lexico-grammatical patterns, and qualitatively through discourse analysis to verify whether the information provided is transparent, namely complete, understandable and reliable. The comparative and micro-diachronic study sets out to highlight similarities and differences in the discourse strategies adopted by the rail companies for (un)transparent reporting of information relating to diversity and inclusion issues.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
22861-74581-1-SM.pdf
Open access
Tipologia:
VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza:
[IR] creative-commons
Dimensione
1.08 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.08 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris




