The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of Populus alba, Populus nigra and Populus tremula imported from the United Kingdom (UK) as: (a) 1- to 7-year-old bare root plants, (b) 3- to 15-year-old plants in pots, (c) 1- to 2-year-old cell grown plants and (d) bundles of 1- to 2-year-old cuttings/graftwood (only for P. nigra and P. tremula), taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this Opinion. Two EU protected zone quarantine pests, i.e. Bemisia tabaci (European populations) and Entoleuca mammata, fulfilled all relevant criteria and were selected for further evaluation. For the selected pests, the risk mitigation measures implemented in the technical dossier from the UK were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. Expert judgements were given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The age of the plants was considered, reasoning that older trees are more likely to be infested mainly due to longer exposure time and larger size. The degree of pest freedom varies between the pests evaluated, with E. mammata being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) indicated with 95% certainty that between 9730 and 10,000 per 10,000 P. tremula rooted plants in pots (3 to 15 year old) will be free from E. mammata.

Commodity risk assessment of Populus alba, Populus nigra and Populus tremula plants from the UK / Vicent Civera, A.; Baptista, P.; Berlin, A.; Chatzivassiliou, E.; Cubero, J.; Cunniffe, N.; De La Peña, E.; Desneux, N.; Di Serio, F.; Filipiak, A.; Hasiów-Jaroszewska, B.; Jactel, H.; Landa, B. B.; Maistrello, L.; Makowski, D.; Milonas, P.; Papadopoulos, N.; Potting, R.; Susi, H.; Van Der Gaag, D. J.; Battisti, A.; Bragard, C.; Magnusson, C. S.; Mas, H.; Rigling, D.; Faccoli, M.; Mikulová, A.; Stergulc, F.; Christoph, E.; Mosbach-Schulz, O.; Streissl, F.; Gonthier, P.. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 23:3(2025), pp. 1-120. [10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9305]

Commodity risk assessment of Populus alba, Populus nigra and Populus tremula plants from the UK

Maistrello L.;
2025

Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by plants of Populus alba, Populus nigra and Populus tremula imported from the United Kingdom (UK) as: (a) 1- to 7-year-old bare root plants, (b) 3- to 15-year-old plants in pots, (c) 1- to 2-year-old cell grown plants and (d) bundles of 1- to 2-year-old cuttings/graftwood (only for P. nigra and P. tremula), taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the UK. All pests associated with the commodity were evaluated against specific criteria for their relevance for this Opinion. Two EU protected zone quarantine pests, i.e. Bemisia tabaci (European populations) and Entoleuca mammata, fulfilled all relevant criteria and were selected for further evaluation. For the selected pests, the risk mitigation measures implemented in the technical dossier from the UK were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. Expert judgements were given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The age of the plants was considered, reasoning that older trees are more likely to be infested mainly due to longer exposure time and larger size. The degree of pest freedom varies between the pests evaluated, with E. mammata being the pest most frequently expected on the imported plants. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation (EKE) indicated with 95% certainty that between 9730 and 10,000 per 10,000 P. tremula rooted plants in pots (3 to 15 year old) will be free from E. mammata.
2025
23
3
1
120
Commodity risk assessment of Populus alba, Populus nigra and Populus tremula plants from the UK / Vicent Civera, A.; Baptista, P.; Berlin, A.; Chatzivassiliou, E.; Cubero, J.; Cunniffe, N.; De La Peña, E.; Desneux, N.; Di Serio, F.; Filipiak, A.; Hasiów-Jaroszewska, B.; Jactel, H.; Landa, B. B.; Maistrello, L.; Makowski, D.; Milonas, P.; Papadopoulos, N.; Potting, R.; Susi, H.; Van Der Gaag, D. J.; Battisti, A.; Bragard, C.; Magnusson, C. S.; Mas, H.; Rigling, D.; Faccoli, M.; Mikulová, A.; Stergulc, F.; Christoph, E.; Mosbach-Schulz, O.; Streissl, F.; Gonthier, P.. - In: EFSA JOURNAL. - ISSN 1831-4732. - 23:3(2025), pp. 1-120. [10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9305]
Vicent Civera, A.; Baptista, P.; Berlin, A.; Chatzivassiliou, E.; Cubero, J.; Cunniffe, N.; De La Peña, E.; Desneux, N.; Di Serio, F.; Filipiak, A.; H...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
EFSA Journal - 2025 - - Commodity risk assessment of Populus alba Populus nigra and Populus tremula plants from the UK.pdf

Open access

Tipologia: VOR - Versione pubblicata dall'editore
Licenza: [IR] creative-commons
Dimensione 1.75 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.75 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

Licenza Creative Commons
I metadati presenti in IRIS UNIMORE sono rilasciati con licenza Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal, mentre i file delle pubblicazioni sono rilasciati con licenza Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale (CC BY 4.0), salvo diversa indicazione.
In caso di violazione di copyright, contattare Supporto Iris

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11380/1376031
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact